13:01:02 #startmeeting OPNFV High availability project meeting 13:01:02 Meeting started Wed Feb 28 13:01:02 2018 UTC. The chair is fuqiao. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:01:02 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 13:01:02 The meeting name has been set to 'opnfv_high_availability_project_meeting' 13:01:21 #chair fuqiao 13:01:21 Current chairs: fuqiao 13:01:28 #info fuqiao 13:01:40 #info Dimitrios Markou 13:02:29 please #info yourself for the HA project. Thanks 13:02:52 #info Kanglin 13:05:21 a few others told me they are at the openstack PTG, and mayby can't make it. 13:05:40 #topic HA test case progress update 13:06:13 #info the MS6 is March 16. all test cases have to be merged before that if we like to be included in the F release 13:06:34 @Dimitrios, how about the progress of the SDN cases? 13:06:34 fuqiao: Error: "Dimitrios," is not a valid command. 13:06:41 Hello 13:06:55 I am trying currently to implement a HA testacse 13:07:00 #info Georg Kunz 13:07:02 hi 13:07:15 But I am having some problems 13:07:15 hi, Georg, welcome 13:07:21 sorry for being late 13:07:39 Can we discuss in this topic ? 13:07:45 I am at the OpenStack PTG and need to leave in 30min again :-/ 13:08:15 Georg: OK 13:08:39 Mardim: you can ask questions to Kanglin, they are familiar with the framework 13:08:56 ok thanks so I am trying to implement this Spec 13:09:02 if the question is too complecated, you may use email or offline discussion 13:09:42 fuqiao, ok I will use the mail because I have many questions 13:10:03 fuqiao, FYI I am having a problem with this : https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/YARDSTICK-1031 13:10:04 OK. you can send email to Kanglin and Qiujuan 13:10:15 ok sure thanks a lot 13:10:46 Mardim: what is the problem with jira? 13:11:22 The probem is that I cannot create the topology which this testcase requires 13:11:25 #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/49245 13:11:38 Because of this Jira ticket 13:11:57 So I opened a Jira ticket to Yardstick so they can fix it somehow 13:12:17 #link https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/YARDSTICK-1031 13:12:37 OK. @kanglin, could you please help look into this? 13:13:32 mardim: I think it can be implemented by adding context information in test cases, but I'm not sure 13:13:47 Kanglin, YEs I am doing exactly that 13:14:11 Kanglin, but yardstick doesn't support the specific topology which is described in the Jira ticket 13:14:29 Kanglin, we should make a python patch to Yardstick so we can fix that 13:14:53 Kanglin, We need changes in the code base of Yardstick 13:14:57 #info Dimitrios is now working on SDN HA test cases, but has problem with the topology. A jira ticket is raised for that bug 13:16:03 mardim: you mean the topology of instances? 13:16:32 Yes exactly 13:16:36 Kanglin, ^ 13:17:10 You cannot create a topology with two instances which are in a different subnet and communicate to eachother over Router 13:17:16 the same router* 13:17:21 Kanglin, ^ 13:18:11 mardim: the topology of instance is supported in yardstick, but current ha test case haven't used yet 13:18:43 Kanglin, Not sure that I understood what you mean 13:18:43 mardin: but I'm not sure whether the topology you described is supported 13:19:03 I think it is not 13:19:13 I read the code base of yardstick 13:19:35 and I found out that you cannot connect two different netwrks to the same Router 13:19:42 if I am not mistaken 13:20:18 Mardim: is this bug easy to fix? is it possible for us to catch the March 16 deadline? 13:20:49 we could also aim for a simplified test case 13:20:50 fuqiao, I think is not an easy fix 13:21:09 and not include the router initially, but just use 2 VMs on a L2 network 13:21:26 georgk, That could worl 13:21:28 work* 13:21:44 But I have several problems which I will describe in a mail later 13:21:55 right now I am trying to find them 13:22:04 ok, let´s go a ¨minimal viable test¨ 13:22:06 because everyday I am discovering something new 13:22:06 :-) 13:22:10 I'll confirm with other guys in yardstick too 13:22:18 ok sure Thanks :) 13:24:03 OK, seems SDN cases are not that easy to finish before the deadline 13:24:21 #info Wangmeng 13:24:31 Kanglin: how about new test cases you proposed in the previous call? I see no new TC discription file uploaded on Gerrit? 13:24:48 are you still plan to add new HA test cases for this release 13:26:16 fuqiao: I'll upload both the TC description and test case a few days later. 13:26:25 OK, great 13:26:43 #info Kanglin will upload new TC description and TC in a few days 13:26:45 Kanglin: cool, does that inculde the implementation as well? 13:26:49 Tomorrow is the deadline of my paper so I'm struggling with it these days, sorry for that 13:27:02 Guys if you want to take a look for the progress so far you can : https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/52159/ 13:27:11 georgk: yes 13:27:21 @Wangmeng, how about the VM HA and hypervisor HA cases? can they be finished before March 16th? 13:27:21 fuqiao: Error: "Wangmeng," is not a valid command. 13:28:07 #info SDN TC link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/52159/ 13:28:15 Mardim: Thank you 13:28:22 No pro! 13:29:59 I have received the new TC descriptions, and I think I can finish them before March 16th 13:31:08 Wangmeng: OK. We can consider upload on gerrit for review, the TC must be merged before Mar. 16, which means you should upload before head to give the community time to review 13:31:58 #info Wangmeng will finish the VM HA and hypervisor HA TC before Mar. 16 13:32:35 OK, I think we have go through all the test cases for this release 13:32:50 fuqiao: yes, I will finish the VM HA and hypervisor HA TC as soon as possible 13:32:57 If no one has further to add, I will end the meeting. 13:33:07 Thank you for everyone to join this. 13:33:18 Wangmeng: thanks! 13:33:45 #endmeeting