#onap-meeting: tsc
Meeting started by atarfish9 at 13:54:09 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- Chris Donley (Chris___,
14:01:27)
- Xiaojun Xie (Xiaojun,
14:02:05)
- Ranny Haiby, Nokia (RannyHaiby,
14:02:25)
- Stephen Terrill, Ericsson (SteveT,
14:02:56)
- Lingli Deng, China Mobile (Lingli_Deng,
14:03:07)
- Jason Hunt, IBM (DJHunt,
14:03:36)
- Brian Hedstrom, ARM (brian_,
14:03:42)
- edwarnicke (edwarnicke,
14:03:54)
- Huabing Zhao ZTE Porxy of Zhaoxing (Huabing_Zhao,
14:04:17)
- Roberto Kung Orange member of TSC (RobertoK,
14:04:54)
- TSC Charter (CaseyODL, 14:05:01)
- xinhui Li, VMware (xinhuili-vmware,
14:06:31)
- http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/onap-meeting/2017/onap-meeting.2017-04-13-13.58.html
<- last weeks minutes (tykeal,
14:06:44)
- Mazin asks that we review the prior weeks
meeting minutes at the start of the TSC Call. (CaseyODL,
14:07:19)
- https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/TSC+Meeting+Resources
<- current agenda (tykeal,
14:07:20)
- Chris asks if the charter could be called the
"Technical Steering Committee" or the "Technical Community
Charter". (CaseyODL,
14:09:48)
- Several members ask how to vote on IRC.
(CaseyODL,
14:10:35)
- Are all attendees able to vote or just Platinum
Members? (brian_,
14:11:36)
- VOTE: Voted on "Call
the carter "Technical Steering Committee?","Technical Community
Charter?" Results are (CaseyODL,
14:12:47)
- VOTE: Voted on "Call
the charter "Technical Steering Committee" (option #1) or "Technical
Community Charter" (option #2)?" Results are, 1: 10, 2: 3
(edwarnicke,
14:15:24)
- AGREED: Call the
charter "Technical Steering Committee" (edwarnicke,
14:16:02)
- Chris continues to speak about the sections of
the TSC Charter. (CaseyODL,
14:17:44)
- Stated that there is an open question regarding
the Project Lifecycle (CaseyODL,
14:19:00)
- Chris asks if the TSC should have the Lifecycle
included in the TSC Charter or in a separate document. (CaseyODL,
14:19:55)
- Ed W. states that the charter will reference
the lifecycle heavily. Suggests that if you separate them there
could be some confusion. (CaseyODL,
14:21:15)
- Someone else asks if there is an existing
Lifecycle doc. (CaseyODL,
14:21:48)
- edwarnicke points out that those references are
often implicit, and thus it would be unclear that they need to
follow a link to a separate doc to dereference them (edwarnicke,
14:21:48)
- VOTE: Voted on "shall
we have a separate project lifecycle document (option 1) or
contained within the TSC charter document (option 2)?" Results are,
1: 5, 2: 10 (phrobb,
14:22:53)
- AGREED: the TSC
agreed to keep the Lifecycle document inside of the TSC
Charter. (CaseyODL,
14:23:53)
- Chris states that minor word changes will be
covered at a later time in the Charter. (CaseyODL,
14:24:41)
- Chris states that the next open question is
regarding the TSC Vice Chair. (CaseyODL,
14:25:40)
- Chris asks if the TSC should have a vice chair
of the TSC. (CaseyODL,
14:26:05)
- VOTE: Voted on "Shall
the TSC have a vice Chair?" Results are, 1: 11, 0: 1, -1: 4
(phrobb,
14:27:12)
- AGREED: the TSC will
have a vice chair. (CaseyODL,
14:27:26)
- AGREED: the TSC shall
have a vice chair (phrobb,
14:27:36)
- The next question is in regards to the
responsibilities of the Vice Chair. (CaseyODL,
14:28:50)
- VOTE: Voted on "The
vice chair will represent the TSC when the TSC Chair is not
available?" Results are, 0: 2, +1: 13 (phrobb,
14:33:03)
- AGREED: the Vice
Chair will represent the TSC when the TSC Chair is not
available. (CaseyODL,
14:33:45)
- Chris state that the charter does not currently
state any specific coordinators. Asks if the TSC should allow
coordinators. (CaseyODL,
14:34:59)
- VOTE: Voted on "shall
the technical community have coordinators for various activities?"
Results are, 0: 1, +1: 15 (phrobb,
14:36:49)
- AGREED: the TSC will
develop a framework to allow Coordinators. (CaseyODL,
14:36:57)
- AGREED: The TSC will
develop a framework to allow Coordinators. (CaseyODL,
14:37:22)
- The question was asked "do we have a preference
for TSC members to occupy the coordinator roles?" (phrobb,
14:38:48)
- A discussion ensued about the TSC Coordinator
origin. Should the preference be given to TSC members or an
appointed community participant. (CaseyODL,
14:42:54)
- Phil Robb suggests that the preference should
be given to the merit of the Technical Ability of the community
member rather than the Corporate membership. (CaseyODL,
14:44:32)
- Are the various "Member" roles
defined/identified in this Charter? For example, defining what a
primary voting TSC member is, an alternative TSC voting member, a
non-voting TSC member, and a non-TSC member? (brian_,
14:45:30)
- Lingli suggests that Coordinator
responsibilities be limited to community members that are associated
with a member company. (CaseyODL,
14:46:45)
- Mazen suggests that coordinators will only be
appointed to people who are dedicated to the community and making
sound decisions. It was also noted that the TSC can change the
appointed Coordinator if they are not performing. (CaseyODL,
14:49:56)
- Phil Robb suggests that it is not a good
practice to require membership for coordinator roles, but leaves the
decision up to the TSC. (CaseyODL,
14:51:12)
- Mazen suggests that the wording for the general
functions for the Coordinators be updated and that the TSC vote on
it next week. (CaseyODL,
14:53:04)
- Chris is moving to section 5.2 TSC
Operations (gildas,
14:53:47)
- Chris asks if the Chair, Vice Chair and
Coordinators should be TSC voting member (CaseyODL,
14:55:22)
- It was suggested that Coordinators do not
belong in that section. (CaseyODL,
14:55:49)
- VOTE: Voted on "shall
we have the TSC vote on the vice chair and coordinator positions?"
Results are, +1: 6 (phrobb,
14:56:31)
- VOTE: Voted on "shall
the TSC vote on the vice chair position?" Results are, +1: 16
(phrobb,
14:57:43)
- AGREED: the TSC will
Elect the Vice Chair position by vote. (CaseyODL,
14:58:38)
- VOTE: Voted on "Shall
the TSC vote on the coordinator positions?" Results are, 0: 1, +1:
14 (phrobb,
14:59:37)
- AGREED: the TSC will
Elect Coordinator position by vote. (CaseyODL,
14:59:51)
- Chris asks if the TSC should include a
mechanism for Sub Committees in the TSC Charter. (CaseyODL,
15:00:48)
- VOTE: Voted on "Shall
the TSC have the mechanism of subcommittees in the TSC charter?"
Results are, 0: 1, +1: 3, -1: 5 (phrobb,
15:04:09)
- VOTE: Voted on "Shall
the TSC have the mechanism of subcommittees in the TSC charter?"
Results are, 0: 1, +1: 7, -1: 6 (phrobb,
15:06:19)
- Mazin suggested to have discussion on this
matter at next TSC meeting. (gildas,
15:06:42)
- before we end the call I wanted to ask if the
May F2F meeting is extending another day on FRI? (brian_,
15:08:29)
- Discussion on Project Proposal is encouraged.
Chris to share Poroject Porposal Materials that have been used in
OPEN-O. (gildas,
15:09:08)
- ACTION: Chris___
Chris to share Project Proposal Materials that have been used in
OPEN-O. (gildas,
15:09:46)
- Can we make FRI part of the F2F and have it a
break-out day for projects? (brian_,
15:11:34)
- Mazin requested to extent next TSC meeting to 2
hours. Meeting will start 30 mns earlier and finish 30 mns later.
Meeting Info will be shared. (gildas,
15:12:47)
- Phill closed the meeting. (gildas,
15:13:25)
Meeting ended at 15:13:39 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- Chris___ Chris to share Project Proposal Materials that have been used in OPEN-O.
Action items, by person
- Chris___
- Chris___ Chris to share Project Proposal Materials that have been used in OPEN-O.
People present (lines said)
- collabot (69)
- CaseyODL (44)
- phrobb (27)
- edwarnicke (17)
- DJHunt (14)
- Lingli_Deng (14)
- Chris___ (14)
- RobertoK (14)
- Xiaojun (13)
- alla (12)
- xinhuili-vmware (12)
- Huabing_Zhao (12)
- aayushJio (11)
- Dsauvageau (11)
- atarfish9 (11)
- rajeshintel (10)
- gilbert (10)
- SteveT (10)
- tykeal (10)
- RannyHaiby (10)
- gildas (8)
- ramesht (7)
- brian_ (7)
- ArthurBerezin (6)
- jplf (1)
- Grace_ (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.