#onap-meeting: Amsterdam M4 Review
Meeting started by phrobb at 08:18:48 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (phrobb, 08:19:06)
- TSC Members Please #info In (phrobb,
08:19:35)
- VFC passes the M4 review (phrobb,
08:22:41)
- AGREED: the VFC
project has passed the M4 Milestone (phrobb,
08:23:06)
- UI (phrobb, 08:25:42)
- Use Case UI (phrobb, 08:28:01)
- from zoom chat: From shentao to All panelists:
(10:36 AM) (kennypaul,
08:41:57)
- A vote was held asking Shall the TSC approve
to remove any non-gating Project contingent on the Release Manager
not being able to validate that all M4 requirements have been met by
Monday 5:00pm PDT Oct. 2nd (phrobb,
08:50:25)
- the vote passed with 11 votes (phrobb,
08:50:41)
- AGREED: by consensus
that Use Case UI has not passed M4 (phrobb,
08:51:14)
- AGREED: the CLI
project has passed M4 (phrobb,
08:52:24)
- AGREED: the CLAMP
project has passed M4 (phrobb,
08:52:52)
- A&AI - A gating project (phrobb,
08:53:19)
- AGREED: A&AI
passes M4 under the condition that the outstanding CSIT tests are
fixed by RC0 (phrobb,
08:54:20)
- CCSDK (phrobb,
08:54:59)
- CCSDK passes M4 (phrobb,
08:58:42)
- AGREED: CCSDK passes
M4 under the condition that the project has ReadTheDoc structure by
Monday and 30% code coverage by 5pm PDT Monday Oct. 2 (phrobb,
09:02:58)
- to reiterate, non gating projects that don't
pass M4 by 5pm Monday PDT will be dropped. Gating project that
don't pass by then will be closely evaluated to determine the best
course for the Amsterdam project (phrobb,
09:05:17)
- SDNC (phrobb,
09:07:00)
- AGREED: SDNC passes
M4 under condition that all their M4 deliverables are met by Monday
5pm PDT (phrobb,
09:09:12)
- AGREED: DCAE passes
M4 (phrobb,
09:11:22)
- Logging Enhancements (phrobb,
09:11:43)
- AGREED: Logging
Enhancement passes M4 under the condition that they meet all M4
requirements by Monday at 5pm PDT (phrobb,
09:15:35)
- SO (phrobb,
09:15:42)
- SO had a large code drop from MSO 2 week ago
with reduced their sonar code coverage from 25% to 12%. The code
coverage needs to be 30% as per M4 requirements (phrobb,
09:21:20)
- AGREED: SO does not
pass M4 (phrobb,
09:27:00)
- Policy (phrobb,
09:27:34)
- AGREED: SO passes
conditional on having all M4 deliverables completed by Monday 5pm
PDT (phrobb,
09:30:02)
- Integration (phrobb,
09:30:58)
- AGREED: the
Integration project passes M4 (phrobb,
09:31:42)
- MultiVIMCloud (phrobb,
10:36:28)
- AGREED: MultiVIM
Cloud passes M4 (phrobb,
10:37:53)
- SDC (phrobb,
10:41:15)
- AGREED: SDC passes M4
conditional on their ReadTheDocs being in place by Monday 5pm
PDT (phrobb,
10:42:02)
- MSB (phrobb,
10:43:33)
- MSB passes M4 conditional on sufficient code
coverage verified by 5pm Monday PDT (phrobb,
10:47:03)
- VVP (phrobb,
10:47:46)
- The project has been behind. It recently
brought seed code forward and is awaiting inbound activities from
the Linux Foundation. (phrobb,
10:56:31)
- VVP is independent from the rest of the ONAP
release (phrobb,
10:56:55)
- AGREED: that VVP is
dropped from the Amsterdam release but the TSC will continue to
monitor progress to understand when they will be distributing
(phrobb,
10:57:41)
- APPC (phrobb,
10:58:00)
- AGREED: APPC passes
M4 (phrobb,
10:58:34)
- VNF Requirements (phrobb,
10:59:30)
- AGREED: VNF
Requirements passes M4 - It also is not directly tied to the rest of
the ONAP Amsterdam release (phrobb,
11:06:45)
- Portal (phrobb,
11:06:56)
- Portal passes M4 conditional on ReadTheDocs
being in place and Sonar updated by 5pm PDT Monday (phrobb,
11:11:15)
- OOM (phrobb,
11:11:23)
- The OOM Project passes M4 (phrobb,
11:33:59)
- much discussion on releasing OOM based on the
limited testing the project will recieve in integration. We may
need to mark OOM as "experimental" or "developer only" type of
release so it can be accessible but clearly indicated as not fully
tested (phrobb,
11:35:31)
- DMAAP (phrobb,
11:35:41)
- project is short on code coverage and estimates
they will be at 30% on Oct. 5th. (phrobb,
11:37:27)
- DMAPP passes M4 conditional on having code
coverage to 30% by Monday 5pm PDT - if not met, status to be
provided (phrobb,
11:41:34)
- AAF (phrobb,
11:41:39)
- AAF does not pass M4 and needs to provide code
coverage by Monday at 5pm PDT or the project will be dropped from
the release (phrobb,
11:42:32)
- Modelling (phrobb,
11:42:40)
- Modelling project is depended upon by
VFC (phrobb,
11:49:32)
- hence the Modelling project is proposed as an
MVP project (phrobb,
11:50:31)
- we also learned there are 4 tosca parsers being
used in Amsterdam. (phrobb,
11:52:57)
- ACTION: Chris Donley
volunteered to facilitate a discussion across the projects to
consolidate their tosca parser usage (phrobb,
11:53:30)
- Modelling is now identified as an MVP
project (phrobb,
11:53:50)
- VID (phrobb,
11:54:03)
- Modelling passes M4 conditional on their
satisfying the M4 criteria by Monday 5PM (phrobb,
11:54:47)
- VID (phrobb,
11:54:55)
- VID does not yet pass M4., They need to
satisfy test code coverage and docs requirements by Monday 5pm or
they will need to be monitored closely until M4 complete'
(phrobb,
11:56:15)
- Doc Project (phrobb,
11:56:27)
- Doc project passes M4 (phrobb,
11:56:54)
- Homes (phrobb,
11:57:09)
- AGREED: Holmes passes
M4 (phrobb,
11:57:44)
- API (phrobb,
11:57:56)
- External API project will only deliver
documentation for Amsterdam (phrobb,
12:00:42)
- AGREED: External API
project passes M4 with a doc only deliverab le (phrobb,
12:01:10)
- VNF SDK (phrobb,
12:01:18)
- AGREED: VNF SDK
passes M4 (phrobb,
12:01:53)
Meeting ended at 14:43:46 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- Chris Donley volunteered to facilitate a discussion across the projects to consolidate their tosca parser usage
People present (lines said)
- phrobb (77)
- collabot` (5)
- kennypaul (4)
- rajeshgadiyar (2)
- SteveT (0)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.