#onap-meeting: CVC/OPNFV/ONAP - Dovetail/VNFSDK/VVP synchro meeting 04/02/2019
Meeting started by morgan_orange at 14:03:27 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- call role (morgan_orange, 14:03:34)
- Kanagaraj (morgan_orange,
14:03:45)
- Margaret Chiosi (morgan_orange,
14:03:51)
- Steven Stark (morgan_orange,
14:03:57)
- georg Kunz (morgan_orange,
14:04:02)
- Lincoln Lavoie (morgan_orange,
14:04:08)
- Rabi (morgan_orange,
14:04:11)
- Stamatis (morgan_orange,
14:04:17)
- Vincent Sharf (morgan_orange,
14:04:22)
- Morgan Richomme (morgan_orange,
14:04:25)
- https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CVC+Joint+Meeting+02-04-2019
(morgan_orange,
14:05:55)
- CVC one click deployment (morgan_orange, 14:07:31)
- presentation LFN CVC installer (morgan_orange,
14:09:17)
- onapui/vnfmarket => GUI to onboard ONAP
services (VNFSDK project) (morgan_orange,
14:10:50)
- market place available since Amsterdam,
verification somehow integrated when uploading the
descriptors (morgan_orange,
14:14:30)
- market place is a feature of an ONAP solution,
not linked to certification (morgan_orange,
14:15:07)
- Dovetail integrated with WNFSDK+ VTP
(morgan_orange,
14:21:13)
- work in progress for VVP (morgan_orange,
14:21:24)
- other participants: Heather, Trevor Cooper,
udhay_vz, Mika Rautakumpu, John Lotoski, pkaralis (morgan_orange,
14:22:54)
- question on the critical path - where are we
today? (morgan_orange,
14:23:50)
- Dovetail +VVP PoC in progress (morgan_orange,
14:24:14)
- Direct integration VVP + Dovetail is
ready (morgan_orange,
14:29:45)
- what is missing today = what ot extract from
the output of the VVP tests (morgan_orange,
14:30:03)
- status PASS/FAIL is enough for the portal =>
access to full output as logs for functest tests (morgan_orange,
14:32:59)
- Stamatis shows last version of the
portal (morgan_orange,
14:35:23)
- contact stamatis on dovetail irc for any
question (morgan_orange,
14:36:45)
- https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/66619/
(morgan_orange,
14:39:00)
- VVP results are very detailed compared to VNFSK
for the moment (morgan_orange,
14:52:56)
- VVP is richer because it has been around much
longer and was based on AT&T's VNF artifact check program
('ICE?') that existed at least 1 year before ONAP was created
(mchiosi,
14:54:27)
- Stamatis says that VNFSDK shall increase the
verbosity of its results to be aligned with VVP (morgan_orange,
14:54:46)
- Vincent suggests to add additional information
(VNF name, version, ..) the info in VVP logs correspond to info more
fore the developpers - no metadata from the VNFs (morgan_orange,
14:56:56)
- Heather : what would it take for Tosca part be
aligned with VVP => to be discussed with VNFSK team? (morgan_orange,
15:06:31)
- ACTION: VNFSDK
evaluate how difficult it is to align Tosca verification results
vith VVP results? (morgan_orange,
15:08:03)
Meeting ended at 15:08:15 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- VNFSDK evaluate how difficult it is to align Tosca verification results vith VVP results?
People present (lines said)
- morgan_orange (41)
- collabot` (6)
- mchiosi (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.