#opendaylight-meeting: OpenDaylight TSC Meeting 2014-05-08
Meeting started by phrobb at 17:00:05 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- TSC members please #info in (phrobb, 17:01:45)
- Rob Dolin proxy for Rajeev Nagar
(Microsoft) (RobDolin,
17:02:30)
- Chris Wright (cdub,
17:02:56)
- Chris O'Shea proxy for Chris Price
(Ericsson) (ChrisOShea,
17:03:04)
- Kent Watsen (Kent,
17:04:16)
- dmm (dmm,
17:04:37)
- Agenda Bashing (phrobb, 17:07:43)
- https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/TSC:Main#Agenda_Summary
(agenda) (dmm,
17:07:47)
- Ed Warnicke (edwarnicke,
17:08:06)
- regXboi for IBM ( I *do* hold the proxy
today) (regXboi,
17:08:06)
- Event Updates (phrobb, 17:08:51)
- http://www.opendaylight.org/events/2014-05-12/openstack-summit-atlanta
(phrobb,
17:09:17)
- dmm mentions that TSC members will be at
OpenStack next week and hopes for running the call next week from
the summit (regXboi,
17:09:46)
- Kent Watsen (kwatsen,
17:09:47)
- At-Large TSC member election update (phrobb, 17:10:05)
- board meeting was held last night and the
"option 1" proposal was discussed (removing the "unless otherwise
represented" language for platinum members). (regXboi,
17:11:23)
- board approved with the stipulation that this
clause only applies to the forthcoming election (regXboi,
17:11:38)
- so by-laws return to the original form for the
next election (regXboi,
17:11:59)
- Committer Promotions (phrobb, 17:13:17)
- https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Group_Policy:Main
(Group Policy) (dmm,
17:13:39)
- proposal: keith burns and rob adams to
committer for group based policy (regXboi,
17:13:54)
- https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2014-May/001172.html
(relevant list thread) (cdub,
17:17:40)
- luis asks, can a committer voluntarily drop
committer responsbility (cdub,
17:22:11)
- we don't have charter mechanism for that, while
could be useful, it's offtopic (cdub,
17:23:07)
- VOTE: Voted on ""Shall
we promote Kieth Burns and Rob Adams to Committer of Group Based
Policy Project?" Results are, 1: 4, 0: 2 (phrobb,
17:23:49)
- AGREED: Keith Burns
and Rob Adams are now Committers on the Group Based Policy
Project (phrobb,
17:24:50)
- Ryan Moats (IBM) suggests this should be a
special case and not a precedent (RobDolin,
17:24:56)
- Creation Reviews (phrobb, 17:25:23)
- Creation-Review: ODL-SDNi App (phrobb, 17:26:22)
- https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:ODL-SDNi_App
(SDNi Project Proposal) (RobDolin,
17:27:45)
- https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/File:SDNiAppProposal1.ppt
<-- slides (cdub,
17:27:51)
- question about whether this is hardcoded or
user defined (regXboi,
17:30:12)
- Q: regXboi asks "since this isn't clustering,
are you assuming you are federating controllers in some way?"
(phrobb,
17:33:58)
- Q in particular what does this project add
above existing clustering capabilities? (phrobb,
17:34:49)
- A We are trying to establish a federation of
controllers - different controllers from different domains
(phrobb,
17:35:25)
- Q: Concern this is federation based on BGP -
issues with securing the data flowing between the domains
(phrobb,
17:43:11)
- Q what is the plan to secure the
trust-path? (phrobb,
17:43:33)
- A: This is a known issue with BGP, with
solutions being worked on (phrobb,
17:45:10)
- I think sacurity of this is being handled in
the sidr IETF working group (rovarga,
17:46:41)
- there are dependencies on existing ODL-BGPCEP
project and those are being taken into account in the release
plan (phrobb,
17:46:47)
- https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Helium_Release_Plan#Participating_Projects
- place to list yourself and your release plan (by Monday 5/12) if
you want to join Helium (edwarnicke,
17:47:13)
- Q: Is this the first proposal that has
described cross-domain federation? (phrobb,
17:48:10)
- A: yes and for opendaylight, things are bottom
up (regXboi,
17:48:36)
- A: This is the first federation type of
proposal, everything before has been more clustering focused…
(phrobb,
17:49:00)
- With a clustering datastore working, similar
functionality is exists but having a more federation-view is also a
valid methodology. (phrobb,
17:50:37)
- Is there any provision for different
controllers having similar/compatible functionality? (phrobb,
17:51:08)
- Current plan is to share the data provided in
this presentation. More information can be shared in the
future (phrobb,
17:53:21)
- VOTE: Voted on "Shall
SDNi be moved to Incubation?" Results are, +1: 6 (phrobb,
17:54:59)
- AGREED: ODL-SDNi is
moved to Incubation (phrobb,
17:55:38)
- Creation Review - South Bound Plugin To The OpenContrail Platform (phrobb, 17:56:09)
- I have to upload the slides to the wiki
first (kwatsen,
17:58:50)
- https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Southbound_plugin_to_the_OpenContrail_platform
(Southbound plugin to the OpenContrail platform Proposal) (RobDolin,
17:59:17)
- LuisGomez notes that the proposal seems to
propose a completely vertically integrated approach with calls going
from the Neutron plugin to their SB plugin and then to OpenContrail,
he asks if there are any plans for more integration in the
future. (colindixon,
18:04:12)
- answer is that they may integrate more in the
future, but for now the veritcal integration is the plan for the
first release efforts (colindixon,
18:04:44)
- Question raised on added value expected from
including OpenContrail plugin within OpenDaylight? (phrobb,
18:10:23)
- A: there have been customers wanting to manage
OpenContrail-manged networks along with other types of networks all
from OpenDaylight (phrobb,
18:11:39)
- Q: Given that Board has a Vendor-Neutral
policy, can the TSC decide on this name? (phrobb,
18:13:16)
- A: dmm states that we will be only voting on
the project. The name of the project is still TBD until the Board
decides on OpenDaylight's "Vendor Neutral" policy (phrobb,
18:14:13)
- VOTE: Voted on ""Shall
the TSC give conditional approval the Southbound Plugin to the
OpenContrail platform" to Incubation.. two conditions 1) the name to
be used for the project not decided, and 2) a successful code scan?"
Results are, 0: 1, +1: 6 (RobDolin,
18:19:16)
- AGREED: Conditional
approval of project proposal (RobDolin,
18:20:25)
- Hydrogen Stable Release (phrobb, 18:20:32)
- https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CrossProject:Stable_Release
(phrobb,
18:21:14)
- https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2014-May/001156.html
<-- mail thread (cdub,
18:21:38)
- discussion ongoing on list. Proposal made to
not Cherrypick all changes to master. Instead pick a point in time
and copy master to stable-branch then pull non-bug-fix patches from
the stable copy. Discussion is ongoing (phrobb,
18:24:22)
- cdub suggests maybe getting the specific
projects that are having the problem of cherrypickig bug-fixes from
master to do the mass-copy. Other projects that have not had that
much delta or cross-project-dependencies can just cherrypick the
bug-fixes. (phrobb,
18:27:59)
- Developer Best Practices (phrobb, 18:36:21)
- https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Developer_Best_Practices
(regXboi,
18:36:32)
- request is for TSC to
advocate/strongly-encourage all projects in OpenDaylight to comply
with 2 recommendations: 1) Build Time Testing, and 2) Comments
documenting the code (phrobb,
18:41:46)
- comments made that this is "Motherhood and
Apple pie", *but* we should probably look at a stylecheck rule that
documentation is done with to succeed a build cycle (phrobb,
18:43:41)
- On commenting - not having comments is the
exception not the norm… ie it must be explained why the comment is
not there. (phrobb,
18:45:17)
- https://pad.opendaylight.org/p/DevelopmentBestPractices
<-- here's what i wrote down as things to consider (cdub,
18:52:53)
- devinavery to continue this discussion on the
list (phrobb,
18:52:57)
- ACTION: devinavery
will send a mail out to start this discussion about code best
practices (colindixon,
18:53:36)
- ovsdb.neutron in SP edition (phrobb, 18:53:41)
- madhu asks TSC " given the interest from the
users, should we add ovsdb integration project to the SP
edition?" (phrobb,
18:54:39)
- dmm notes that this request is also to add
ovsdb to Hydrogen SP release (phrobb,
18:56:44)
- dmm suggests that we take this discussion to
the List to further explore ovsdb inclusion into stable hydrogen
release of the SP edition (phrobb,
19:00:18)
Meeting ended at 19:00:33 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- devinavery will send a mail out to start this discussion about code best practices
Action items, by person
- devinavery
- devinavery will send a mail out to start this discussion about code best practices
People present (lines said)
- phrobb (54)
- cdub (40)
- regXboi (29)
- odl_meetbot (26)
- edwarnicke (23)
- Madhu (20)
- RobDolin (13)
- dmm (10)
- colindixon (10)
- rovarga (7)
- kwatsen (6)
- ChrisOShea (5)
- alagalah (5)
- ChrsPriceAB (3)
- dkehnx (3)
- networkstatic (2)
- tbachman (2)
- readams (2)
- devinavery (1)
- Kent (1)
- raghu67_ (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.