#opendaylight-meeting: tsc

Meeting started by colindixon at 17:00:37 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. agenda bashing and roll call (colindixon, 17:00:48)
    1. colindixon (colindixon, 17:00:56)
    2. gkaempfer (gkaempfer, 17:01:46)
    3. adetalhouet (adetalhouet, 17:01:47)
    4. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/index.php?title=TSC:Main&oldid=51341#Agenda the agenda (colindixon, 17:02:10)
    5. https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2016/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2016-10-20-17.00.html (colindixon, 17:02:15)
    6. abhijitkumbhare (abhijitkumbhare, 17:02:19)
    7. phrobb to got the OPNFV plugfest on our events page https://www.opendaylight.org/global-events (colindixon, 17:02:25)
    8. ChrisPriceAB opened a mailing list thread on release@ and tsc@ to talk about how to help projects that cross ODL/OPNFV deliver on promises in both places at the same time (colindixon, 17:02:30)
    9. colindixon started a thread on networking ODL in Ocata on the neutron-dev list: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/neutron-dev/2016-October/001040.html (colindixon, 17:02:44)
    10. phrobb sent mail to all people who are eligible to run that they are eligible as well as asking for self-nomination (colindixon, 17:02:51)
    11. skitt updated the wiki with odlparent being mature: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Category:Mature_Projects (colindixon, 17:02:57)
    12. ACTION: colindixon, zxiiro and phrobb to come up with a proposal for tracking project activity in a positive way (colindixon, 17:03:05)
    13. ACTION: colindixon and zxiiro to work on trying to build tools to help with what's failing on failures in our jenkins jobs (colindixon, 17:03:24)
    14. ACTION: dfarrell07 colindixon to try to drive some/all of the ongoing TSC discussions to completion (colindixon, 17:03:24)
    15. ACTION: colindixon to change the project facts template to include a type field and then auto-populate lists based on that information (colindixon, 17:03:24)
    16. ACTION: phrobb to work on getting us better control of the events page to make his life less painful (colindixon, 17:03:39)
    17. ACTION: phrobb and tykeal to look into an ODL infra micro-datacenter in a box to make things work better (colindixon, 17:03:48)
    18. Daniel Farrell (dfarrell07, 17:04:21)
    19. anipbu has changed it so that the wiki of project types points to the tracking spreadsheet showing project types (colindixon, 17:04:37)
    20. edwarnicke (edwarnicke, 17:04:40)

  2. mailing list discussions (colindixon, 17:05:31)
    1. rovarga for jmedved (rovarga, 17:05:41)
    2. https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/neutron-dev/2016-October/001040.html thread on networking-odl in ocata (colindixon, 17:05:46)
    3. https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2016-October/006188.html thread on syncing ODL/OPNFV in Danube/Carbon (colindixon, 17:07:02)
    4. ebrjohn for ChrisPriceAB (colindixon, 17:07:16)
    5. Brady Johnson (ebrjohn, 17:07:19)

  3. events (colindixon, 17:07:26)
    1. https://www.opendaylight.org/global-events (colindixon, 17:07:37)
    2. OpenStack summit is going on in Barcelona right now, anything that has to do with NFV or SFC gets lots of mentioning of ODL (colindixon, 17:08:06)
    3. presentations on ODL in the marketplace have been packed, booth is active (colindixon, 17:08:23)
    4. panels with ODL/OPNFV folks was well-received (colindixon, 17:08:36)
    5. https://www.opendaylight.org/events/2016-11-16-000000-2016-11-17-000000/opendaylight-forum-india the India forum is coming up soon on 11/16 (colindixon, 17:09:38)

  4. boron (colindixon, 17:10:09)
    1. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release/Boron/SR1/Status <--- We initially targeted Boron SR1 Release on 10/27, but our latest build has blocker bugs in NETVIRT/SFC, CENTINEL, OPENFLOWPLUGIN, YANGTOOLS (anipbu, 17:10:23)
    2. I think the lesson learned is that having a release during the the OpenStack summit (colindixon, 17:11:20)
    3. colindixon asks and it turns out that the blocking bugs above appear to all not be regressions from Boron release, but rather regressions either from intended behavior or from Beryllium release (colindixon, 17:15:22)
    4. it is still the case that these are all significant bugs that we'd like to get fixed (colindixon, 17:15:45)
    5. AGREED: we will wait until next week to try to release Boron-SR1 (colindixon, 17:17:20)
    6. at some point, we will have to draw a line in the sand and be pretty strict about what's a blocker and not (colindixon, 17:17:44)

  5. carbon (colindixon, 17:19:11)
    1. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Carbon_Release_Plan#M1:_Draft_Plan <--- Carbon M1 Offset 1 Status is due on today 10/27 (anipbu, 17:19:23)
    2. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Weather#Fix_of_mandatory_nodes_augmentation_to_target_in_another_module <--- Mandatory nodes cannot be added to node from another module via augmentation (anipbu, 17:19:30)
    3. https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2016-October/008601.html <--- There are Carbon Autorelease Build Failures in sal-clustering-commons. (anipbu, 17:20:00)
    4. the weather item has already been merged, no complaints so far (rovarga, 17:22:12)
    5. https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/atrium-dev/2016-October/000029.html (anipbu, 17:23:26)
    6. colindixon asks if we can try to reach out to the other two committers and drop atrium from autorelease to unblock things in the meantime (colindixon, 17:26:28)
    7. ACTION: anipbu to reach out to the two committers on atrium to tell them Harsh Awasthi <harsh.52@wipro.com>, Subhash Singh <subhash_singh@criterionnetworks.com> (colindixon, 17:31:25)
    8. https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/47630/ centinel reported the bug as blocking in Boron-SR1, it was merged on master, but not stable/boron (colindixon, 17:31:30)
    9. colindixon says that if centinel hasn't bothered to report the bug or merge the patch, he's tempted to ship it broken in Boron-SR1 (colindixon, 17:31:54)
    10. ACTION: anipbu will continue to attempt to contact centinel, warning them that we relaly need it merged, if we get to a boron respin without that patch, maybe ask the question again on the tsc list (colindixon, 17:36:25)
    11. https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/46265/ (rovarga, 17:36:40)
    12. the above patch will fix an issue with an sdninterface app that is the same as the centinel patch (colindixon, 17:37:06)
    13. ACTION: anipbu to follow up with sdninferfaceapp w.r.t. 46265 (colindixon, 17:37:34)

  6. system integration and test (colindixon, 17:38:18)
    1. a system test library broke a couple projects for the distribution test jobs, it should be fixed now (colindixon, 17:38:36)
    2. https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/47558/ <--- system test library fix/workaround (jamoluhrsen, 17:39:04)

  7. infra (colindixon, 17:39:39)
    1. last Saturday we upgraded nexus and jenkins sandbox (colindixon, 17:39:39)
    2. this past week on Tuesday and yesterday, we had security updates rolled out because of the dirty cow CVE (colindixon, 17:39:39)
    3. the only issue that came out was that the CSIT jobs had issues as things came back up because of a huge swatch of jobs, but it resolve itself over 90 minutes (colindixon, 17:40:08)
    4. tykeal has info about upgrading F5 devices with 10G NICs, but hasn't had a chance to look at it yet (colindixon, 17:40:31)

  8. Federation Service Creation Review (colindixon, 17:41:04)
    1. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Federation_Service (colindixon, 17:41:14)
    2. https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/2016-October/000537.html Proposed on 10/5/2016 (colindixon, 17:41:46)
    3. the federation service is a set of utilities to allow for two different OpenDaylight clusters to share information with eachother to allow for cross-cluster functionality (colindixon, 17:44:41)
    4. this is different is from existing mechanims that are mostly about syncing state, not sharing state (colindixon, 17:48:02)
    5. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:DluxApps (colindixon, 17:50:36)
    6. edwarnicke asks why offset 1 and kernel vs. offset 0, gkaempfer basically says it's not quite so basic as offset 0 projcts, but still important (colindixon, 17:51:49)
    7. rovarga says that having this be offset 0 woudl help having staged releases of kernel vs. plugin (colindixon, 17:52:34)
    8. VOTE: Voted on "shall the TSC move the federation project to an incubation project?" Results are, +1: 7 (colindixon, 17:53:59)
    9. AGREED: the federation project is now an incubation project in ODL (colindixon, 17:54:17)

  9. Dlux Apps Creation review (colindixon, 17:54:23)
    1. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:DluxApps (colindixon, 17:54:23)
    2. proposed on https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/2016-October/000544.html proposed 10/13/2016 (colindixon, 17:54:25)
    3. basically this is a split of Dlux into the core of dlux that people know how to maintain and apps that are harder to get things fixed for and getting patches merged for apps (colindixon, 17:56:30)
    4. the goal is to have an apps repo with more committers to allow apps to updated with fewer blocking times, while keeping the integrity of the dlux core and committers on that project (colindixon, 17:57:20)
    5. the plan is to have this bee offset 1 and ideally share mailing lists with dlux because they are so close (colindixon, 17:59:23)
    6. colindixon asked over e-mail if this really solves the problem since we'll still likely have a bunch of committers who don't know all the apps in the single apps repo, but the hope is that a broader set of committers will keep things better than before (colindixon, 18:00:06)
    7. abhijitkumbhare asks if dlux is offset 1, how can dlux apps also be offset 1? (colindixon, 18:00:39)
    8. dmalachovsky says that they feel the can manage it (colindixon, 18:00:48)
    9. the same way yangtools and netconf can be in offset-0 :) (rovarga, 18:01:10)
    10. colindixon notes that there are only 3 offsets and the dependency tree for ODL is somewhre in the the 9-12 range, so there must be projects that depend on each other in the same offset (colindixon, 18:02:05)
    11. VOTE: Voted on "shall the TSC move DluxApps to being an incubation project?" Results are, +1: 7 (colindixon, 18:02:49)
    12. AGREED: DluxApps is now an incubation proejct (colindixon, 18:03:11)
    13. colindixon asks if it should be dlux/apps or dluxapps? (colindixon, 18:03:41)
    14. edwarnicke points out that will result in a directory called apps, which could be confusing (colindixon, 18:04:07)
    15. it sounds like dluxapps is a better move (colindixon, 18:04:13)

  10. cookies (colindixon, 18:04:28)
    1. there was meeting on networking-odl in ocata in Barcelona and there will more details on the public thread to follow (colindixon, 18:05:40)


Meeting ended at 18:05:53 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. colindixon, zxiiro and phrobb to come up with a proposal for tracking project activity in a positive way
  2. colindixon and zxiiro to work on trying to build tools to help with what's failing on failures in our jenkins jobs
  3. dfarrell07 colindixon to try to drive some/all of the ongoing TSC discussions to completion
  4. colindixon to change the project facts template to include a type field and then auto-populate lists based on that information
  5. phrobb to work on getting us better control of the events page to make his life less painful
  6. phrobb and tykeal to look into an ODL infra micro-datacenter in a box to make things work better
  7. anipbu to reach out to the two committers on atrium to tell them Harsh Awasthi <harsh.52@wipro.com>, Subhash Singh <subhash_singh@criterionnetworks.com>
  8. anipbu will continue to attempt to contact centinel, warning them that we relaly need it merged, if we get to a boron respin without that patch, maybe ask the question again on the tsc list
  9. anipbu to follow up with sdninferfaceapp w.r.t. 46265


Action items, by person

  1. anipbu
    1. anipbu to reach out to the two committers on atrium to tell them Harsh Awasthi <harsh.52@wipro.com>, Subhash Singh <subhash_singh@criterionnetworks.com>
    2. anipbu will continue to attempt to contact centinel, warning them that we relaly need it merged, if we get to a boron respin without that patch, maybe ask the question again on the tsc list
    3. anipbu to follow up with sdninferfaceapp w.r.t. 46265
  2. colindixon
    1. colindixon, zxiiro and phrobb to come up with a proposal for tracking project activity in a positive way
    2. colindixon and zxiiro to work on trying to build tools to help with what's failing on failures in our jenkins jobs
    3. dfarrell07 colindixon to try to drive some/all of the ongoing TSC discussions to completion
    4. colindixon to change the project facts template to include a type field and then auto-populate lists based on that information
  3. dfarrell07
    1. dfarrell07 colindixon to try to drive some/all of the ongoing TSC discussions to completion
  4. phrobb
    1. colindixon, zxiiro and phrobb to come up with a proposal for tracking project activity in a positive way
    2. phrobb to work on getting us better control of the events page to make his life less painful
    3. phrobb and tykeal to look into an ODL infra micro-datacenter in a box to make things work better
  5. tykeal
    1. phrobb and tykeal to look into an ODL infra micro-datacenter in a box to make things work better


People present (lines said)

  1. colindixon (97)
  2. odl_meetbot (16)
  3. ebrjohn (7)
  4. anipbu (7)
  5. rovarga (6)
  6. adetalhouet (5)
  7. edwarnicke (4)
  8. ChrisPriceAB (3)
  9. dfarrell07 (3)
  10. abhijitkumbhare (3)
  11. tykeal (2)
  12. dmalachovsky (1)
  13. gkaempfer (1)
  14. jamoluhrsen (1)
  15. phrobb (0)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.