#opendaylight-nic: weekly-status

Meeting summary

1. 1. dbainbri (dbainbri, 15:04:31)
   2. Hideyuki Tai (hideyuki, 15:04:33)
   3. adetalhouet (adetalhouet, 15:04:38)
   
   
2. Helium (adetalhouet, 15:04:47)
   1. renato_aguiar (renato_aguiar, 15:05:05)
   2. Cut off for Helium doesn't affect us as we don't have any patches (adetalhouet, 15:05:50)
   
   
3. Berylium (adetalhouet, 15:06:00)
   1. How to document action for each renderer type? (adetalhouet, 15:08:44)
   2. dbainbri said we could have a different lead for each renderer? (adetalhouet, 15:10:09)
   3. dbainbri said we could have a lead for the control loop (adetalhouet, 15:10:24)
   4. lead would have to document the wiki and help folks on how to do (adetalhouet, 15:11:05)
   5. dbainbri: DSL concept means: intent can be express, so the tough was that we could threat all this expression as DSL (adetalhouet, 15:12:32)
   6. dbainbri the idea is one intent abstraction (adetalhouet, 15:13:59)
   7. two concept: 1. renderer that goes down to some common core abstraction (core policies) 2. Other project, as NEMO, could compile as Intent, but this couldn't be control (adetalhouet, 15:15:06)
   8. this will allow the renderer to implement Intent how they intend to do (adetalhouet, 15:15:41)
   9. Be will keep renderer's flexibility (adetalhouet, 15:17:14)
   10. Renderers should describe how the action behave, how they should be compose (adetalhouet, 15:19:51)
   11. (altonfong, 15:20:29)
   12. but for instance Action should be compatible with all renderers as we wan't to avoid incompatibility between actions (adetalhouet, 15:20:45)
   13. idea: have a compiler for each Renderers (adetalhouet, 15:21:48)
   14. idea: when a new action is added, a snippet could be added dynamically to each renderer (GBP, VTN, OF, ...) (adetalhouet, 15:23:41)
   15. we need a PL for each kind of renderer that will well define the scope for renderer, in wiki (adetalhouet, 15:25:55)
   16. need to be on the same page regarding terminology (adetalhouet, 15:28:07)
   17. ACTION: Dave Lenrow to post the link to the draft document regarding Intent (adetalhouet, 15:30:05)
   
   
4. Project Technical Lead (adetalhouet, 15:31:11)
   1. the TSC won't push this, so the thought is to do a checkpoint as each release (adetalhouet, 15:31:53)
   2. if we want to change PTL, someone can just self nominate by sending a mail to the mailing list (adetalhouet, 15:32:23)
   3. if no one self nominate, thing stays the same (adetalhouet, 15:32:41)
   
   
5. cookies (adetalhouet, 15:32:58)

Action items

1. Dave Lenrow to post the link to the draft document regarding Intent

People present (lines said)

1. adetalhouet (33)
2. odl_meetbot (5)
3. gzhao (3)
4. dbainbri (3)
5. renato_aguiar (1)
6. altonfong (1)
7. hideyuki (1)