#opendaylight-openflowplugin: OpenFlow plugin bug scrub
Meeting started by abhijitkumbhare at 17:16:58 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Bugs list (blocker, critical, major) (abhijitkumbhare, 17:17:47)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/buglist.cgi?bug_severity=blocker&bug_severity=critical&bug_severity=major&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=IN_PROGRESS&bug_status=WAITING_FOR_REVIEW&list_id=39862&product=openflowplugin&query_format=advanced&resolution=---
(abhijitkumbhare,
17:18:42)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3735
“flows not removed from the switch when 80k flows configured” (abhijitkumbhare,
17:20:47)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3741
“groups and meters tests fails for Li design ofp” (abhijitkumbhare,
17:28:51)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3762
“flows statistics unstable when 80k flow configured” (abhijitkumbhare,
17:32:44)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4104
“Problems observed when connecting openflow switches to multiple
instances of controller" (abhijitkumbhare,
17:41:08)
- 4104 assigned to Kamal (abhijitkumbhare,
17:44:28)
- 4104 prio lowered as the feature not
ready (abhijitkumbhare,
17:44:49)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4062
“Flow Reconciliator does not account for flow-deletions when the
switch connection is disrupted" (abhijitkumbhare,
17:45:21)
- Muthu has already picked 4062 (abhijitkumbhare,
17:46:11)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3039
“NxmNxTunIpv4Src not supported” (abhijitkumbhare,
17:46:55)
- lowered priority of 3039 to normal (due to only
the alien issue remaining) - assigned it to Michal Rehak for his
thoughts on this (abhijitkumbhare,
17:51:06)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3774
“stats for 80k fows not collected properly after mininet restart”
(abhijitkumbhare,
17:51:39)
- Kavitha has taken 3774 - most likely she
intends to do this later - will ask update on this on the bug
(abhijitkumbhare,
17:53:17)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4069
“[GROUP RECONCILIATION] Group Chaining fails during reconciliation”
(abhijitkumbhare,
17:54:42)
- Related to reconciliation - assigning it to
Shuva (abhijitkumbhare,
17:55:10)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3754
“NPE at
org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.openflow.md.core.ConnectionConductorImpl.updatePort(ConnectionConductorImpl.java:299)[256:org.opendaylight.openflowplugin:0.1.0.SNAPSHOT]”
(abhijitkumbhare,
17:56:38)
- Fixed but need to check with Martin if has been
pushed to stable/lithium (abhijitkumbhare,
17:58:06)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4099
“[GROUP RECONCILIATION]Groups pointing to ports donot reconcile if
ports come up late” (abhijitkumbhare,
20:03:26)
- assigned to Shuva since this is reconciliation
related (abhijitkumbhare,
20:05:26)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4111
“[FLOW RECONCILIATION]Expirable flows appear in the switch post
reconnect” (abhijitkumbhare,
20:06:00)
- assigned to Shuva as part of reconciliation
work (abhijitkumbhare,
20:07:03)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3548
“LLDP speaker does not start/stop sending LLDP packets on port
up/down events" (abhijitkumbhare,
20:07:50)
- https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/23795/
(vishnoianil,
20:10:44)
- ACTION: LuisGomez to
recheck bug 3548 (abhijitkumbhare,
20:13:21)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4064
“[GROUP-CHAINING]Deleting a child Indirect-Group from a parent
All-group does not delete the parent from the config DS" (abhijitkumbhare,
20:13:57)
- ACTION: Muthu to
check 4064 is really a bug - and whether an empty group should be a
concern? (abhijitkumbhare,
20:24:39)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2985
“Detailed Documention of different ways of programming flows,
meters, groups including acks/barriers, DS vs RPCs, operational vs
cfg DS" (abhijitkumbhare,
20:25:30)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2664
(LuisGomez,
20:28:48)
- https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2664
“Buckets in groups are not ordered" (abhijitkumbhare,
20:29:11)
- ACTION: abhijitkumbhare LuisGomez to discuss the priority
“normal” in the future (abhijitkumbhare,
20:36:11)
Meeting ended at 20:36:23 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- LuisGomez to recheck bug 3548
- Muthu to check 4064 is really a bug - and whether an empty group should be a concern?
- abhijitkumbhare LuisGomez to discuss the priority “normal” in the future
Action items, by person
- abhijitkumbhare
- abhijitkumbhare LuisGomez to discuss the priority “normal” in the future
- LuisGomez
- LuisGomez to recheck bug 3548
- abhijitkumbhare LuisGomez to discuss the priority “normal” in the future
People present (lines said)
- abhijitkumbhare (125)
- LuisGomez (90)
- odl_meetbot (9)
- vishnoianil (9)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.