#opendaylight-openflowplugin: OpenFlow Plugin Oct 19
Meeting started by abhijitkumbhare at 16:10:43 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- vishnoianil (vishnoianil__,
16:12:11)
- Agenda (abhijitkumbhare, 16:12:46)
- M4 deliverables (abhijitkumbhare,
16:13:00)
- Technical issues (abhijitkumbhare,
16:13:14)
- Status of the Lithium design - clustering - as
well aswhere it stands with respect to the comparison we had
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OpenFlow_Plugin:He_vs_Li_comparison
(abhijitkumbhare,
16:13:31)
- OpenFlow plugin committers (abhijitkumbhare,
16:14:03)
- M4 deliverables (abhijitkumbhare, 16:17:11)
- OpenFlow clustering design for the existing
design - in progress (abhijitkumbhare,
16:21:57)
- Vacancy events - Gaurav Pandey to demo the
partial 1.4 related features next meeting (abhijitkumbhare,
16:23:13)
- Flow, group, meter ordering - Muthu says group
ordering pushed in (abhijitkumbhare,
16:24:06)
- Muthu mentions port ordering code complete -
being tested (abhijitkumbhare,
16:25:03)
- Muthu mention reconciliation framework - work
in progress, modeling completed (abhijitkumbhare,
16:25:49)
- "Add support to HPE's OpenFlow matching
extensions" - renato_aguiar will start on this next week
(abhijitkumbhare,
16:27:45)
- renato_aguiar working on stats optimizations at
the moment and there is a chance that this (HPE OpenFlow extensions)
may be pushed (abhijitkumbhare,
16:28:58)
- renato_aguiar pushing some patches - one
related to table features, another a request from NIC (abhijitkumbhare,
16:30:24)
- New stuff needed by other projects (abhijitkumbhare, 16:36:38)
- michal_rehak to work on multipart experimenter
messages since he has now some cycles on this - this will help the
circuit switch project (Aneesha) (abhijitkumbhare,
16:37:44)
- vishnoianil__ says OVSDB Net Virt also needs an
extension (port range - bug 4411) (abhijitkumbhare,
16:38:26)
- enhancement bug
https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4411 (vishnoianil__,
16:38:28)
- vishnoianil__ will work on this unless someone
picks this up (abhijitkumbhare,
16:38:53)
- Status of the Lithium design (abhijitkumbhare, 16:39:34)
- abhijitkumbhare asks michal_rehak about where
are we with this? (abhijitkumbhare,
16:40:48)
- Currently not many downstream projects using
this - we need to educate the community on how to migrate as well as
have clear instructions (abhijitkumbhare,
16:45:37)
- Need to find out how the downstream projects
are using the OpenFlow plugin, which design they are using
(abhijitkumbhare,
16:46:20)
- We need to study this more (abhijitkumbhare,
16:47:52)
- renato_aguiar what are the things only
supported in the existing design (abhijitkumbhare,
16:49:27)
- michal_rehak says notifications are not
supported (abhijitkumbhare,
16:50:57)
- vishnoianil__ mentions applications need to use
data change notifications and need to change in order to use the
Lithium design (abhijitkumbhare,
16:51:13)
- Few projects which may have used Lithium design
- GBP (there have been some bugs filed), L2 switch, NIC &
DIDM (abhijitkumbhare,
16:56:11)
- Muthu mentions he prefers the datastore
notifications (of the Lithium design) rather than the yang
notifications - as he finds them more reliable (abhijitkumbhare,
17:02:24)
- ACTION: abhijitkumbhare to reach out to individual project
members to discuss Lithium design in more detail (abhijitkumbhare,
17:03:46)
Meeting ended at 17:04:13 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- abhijitkumbhare to reach out to individual project members to discuss Lithium design in more detail
Action items, by person
- abhijitkumbhare
- abhijitkumbhare to reach out to individual project members to discuss Lithium design in more detail
People present (lines said)
- abhijitkumbhare (35)
- odl_meetbot (5)
- vishnoianil__ (3)
- michal_rehak (1)
- renato_aguiar (0)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.