#opnfv-armband: armband_27May2016
Meeting started by bobmonkman at 13:55:24 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- Bob Monkman (bobmonkman,
13:55:42)
- Josep Puigdemont (joseppc,
13:55:57)
- Florin Dumitrascu (florind,
13:56:14)
- Alexandru Avadanii (Enea) (AlexAvadanii,
13:58:05)
- Joe Kidder (joekidder,
14:06:00)
- First item on list is to discuss status of CI
loop testing (bobmonkman,
14:06:42)
- there was some input that CI loop for ARM pod
was failing occasionally (bobmonkman,
14:10:10)
- https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pBUtYkl46LcPDMeUa5cwqtwnBS0YSWew2L-YCPfBYAo/edit#gid=1628305204
(AlexAvadanii,
14:10:42)
- this change set is pending on fuel@opnfv to be able to build https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/13919/
(joseppc,
14:12:27)
- the passing is actually stable although
sometimes we need to take the pod ofline line for development
(bobmonkman,
14:13:36)
- we do not yet enough pods/servers to do
development and CI testing. (bobmonkman,
14:14:18)
- the IPMI workaround has been already merged to brahma and master
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/14731/
(AlexAvadanii,
14:14:30)
- https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Armband_Colorado_Prestudy_Draft
(AlexAvadanii,
14:17:13)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/fuel/Fuel+OPNFV+Colorado+work-package+planning
(ODL Beryllium SR3) (joseppc,
14:17:27)
- fuel plugins are generally build at the same
time as ISO and these have hard coded to pathes for x86
images (bobmonkman,
14:21:36)
- option otherwise is to allow support pre-built
plug-ins (bobmonkman,
14:25:47)
- ACTION: Bob to
arrange joining a future Fual Installer Project to raise this
issues. (bobmonkman,
14:26:19)
- ACTION: Bob to
arraneg offline with Stan and ALex on the best appraoch and the ask
we need to make. (bobmonkman,
14:29:44)
- discussion on additional installers and
controllers (bobmonkman,
14:34:06)
- reiterated that there will a plan to minimize
scope of Colorado R1 and look to R2 or R3 to add additonal
installers and contorllers (bobmonkman,
14:35:28)
- status of JOID installer is that they had some
credential access issue and Enea has resolved that issue
(bobmonkman,
14:36:17)
- ball in their court to begin testing
(bobmonkman,
14:36:35)
- Apex team also has been provided credential and
2 APM servers and they have acked the receipt and waitig fo rthem to
begin (bobmonkman,
14:37:17)
- discussion on additional SDN Controllers
(bobmonkman,
14:39:07)
- NXP team says OpenContrail has better support
for SFC and seems to get better commerical traction (bobmonkman,
14:41:28)
- others have seen the same commercial traction.
so we could decide to target additonal SDNn cotnrollers or Colorada
R2/3 (bobmonkman,
14:42:06)
- Mike R dropped into the YardStick and the
project was adding DPDK testing (bobmonkman,
14:43:52)
- The question was asked if ODP tests could be
added for more general coverage (bobmonkman,
14:44:27)
- Yardstick project asked if Armband could
contribute anything. (bobmonkman,
14:46:45)
- ACTION: Bob will to
investigate further and seek to ensure that tests for specific
Network I/O/data plabe frameworks are optional and not forced on
everyone (bobmonkman,
14:54:45)
Meeting ended at 14:55:42 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- Bob to arrange joining a future Fual Installer Project to raise this issues.
- Bob to arraneg offline with Stan and ALex on the best appraoch and the ask we need to make.
- Bob will to investigate further and seek to ensure that tests for specific Network I/O/data plabe frameworks are optional and not forced on everyone
People present (lines said)
- bobmonkman (25)
- AlexAvadanii (4)
- joseppc (3)
- collabot` (3)
- joekidder (1)
- florind (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.