#opnfv-meeting: OPNFV-TSC
Meeting started by dlenrow at 13:57:46 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- Chris Price (ChrisPriceAB,
14:01:21)
- Dave Lenrow (dlenrow,
14:01:33)
- Wenjing Chu (Wenjing,
14:03:21)
- Ray Paik (rpaik,
14:05:42)
- DirkKutscher (DirkKutscher,
14:07:07)
- Tapio Tallgren (TapioTallgren,
14:07:07)
- a popular IRC web client is
http://www.irccloud.com, no personal or HP interest here, just
FYI (dlenrow,
14:09:55)
- Brian Smith (B_Smith_,
14:11:18)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/tsc (ChrisPriceAB,
14:19:29)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/tsc
(ChrisPriceAB,
14:19:33)
- CP proposes to defer approval of previous
minutes to next week (dlenrow,
14:20:37)
- no additions to agenda (dlenrow,
14:21:13)
- project proposals and reviews (dlenrow, 14:21:22)
- need to put proposals on main wiki under
project proposals (dlenrow,
14:21:45)
- project proposals https://wiki.opnfv.org/project_proposals
(ChrisPriceAB,
14:22:01)
- use template there and send email to discuss to
announce added proposal (dlenrow,
14:22:05)
- Current four week window for public
review/discussion (dlenrow,
14:23:10)
- before they can seek approval (dlenrow,
14:23:22)
- probably want to revisit duration of public
review period (dlenrow,
14:24:33)
- Need to set a date for cutoff to join first
simult. release (dlenrow,
14:26:08)
- we then back out dates for when projects need
to get approved (dlenrow,
14:26:30)
- approved No objections to vote changing project
proposal public review period to 2 weeks instead of 4 (dlenrow,
14:29:27)
- upstream community plan (dlenrow, 14:29:55)
- CP reminds we were proposing to target stable
releases from upstream projects (dlenrow,
14:30:23)
- CP reached out to discuss with ODL (dlenrow,
14:30:43)
- question asked how do we engage in making
upstream changes? (dlenrow,
14:31:48)
- CP: suggests we have devs who work in upstream
projects and serve OPNFV needs (dlenrow,
14:32:42)
- Ashiq: Can we setup sort of liasion with OSS
upstream (dlenrow,
14:34:13)
- agreement that, although hard to formally do so
with OSS projects, we can have point of contact assigned within
OPNFV TSC (dlenrow,
14:35:00)
- Parviz asks single or group of contacts
(dlenrow,
14:36:30)
- Ian: if we had group of folks working upstream
should they be a project? Have TSC oversight? (dlenrow,
14:38:48)
- for example, OpenStack need planning/process
to make community-consumable. Work may be non-trivial. (dlenrow,
14:39:54)
- Palani: Describes two parts 1)
blueprint/planning 2) aligning release dates for features, etc. Need
close coordination (dlenrow,
14:42:00)
- proposed action item for TSC. Write down
timeline for integrating with upstream projects identified to
date (dlenrow,
14:43:34)
- Palani: Yes we need gap analysis against
upstream roadmaps (dlenrow,
14:43:59)
- CP starts with OStack and ODL and proposes Juno
and Helium as the platform for our 1H2015 first release (dlenrow,
14:44:54)
- This means we need to articulate our needs to
upstream six months in advance (dlenrow,
14:45:15)
- Need solid plan for working with
upstream (dlenrow,
14:45:43)
- need to start firming up a simultaneous release
process so that folks can begin to plan. (dlenrow,
14:46:11)
- CP asks for folks with experience to help draft
a SR process? (dlenrow,
14:46:33)
- Palani volunteers to work but can't start this
week. (dlenrow,
14:47:53)
- ACTION: Dlenrow to
draft SR process wiki page ASAP (dlenrow,
14:49:31)
- Need a CI project proposal ASAP (dlenrow,
14:50:09)
- ACTION: Ian/Ulrich
begin to draft this (dlenrow,
14:51:48)
- group is working on testing project
proposal (dlenrow,
14:53:07)
- CP propose getting initial thoughts on the
wiki (dlenrow,
14:53:35)
- question where are the proposed activities from
community discussion? (dlenrow,
14:54:21)
- they are on the wiki (dlenrow,
14:54:27)
- reminder project proposal mostly captures
scope. There is not need to document implementation plans in
detail (dlenrow,
14:56:17)
- Agree to start threads to work on these
projects-to-be (dlenrow,
14:57:58)
- CP will follow up with folks self-identified as
willing to work (dlenrow,
14:58:16)
- testing has already scheduled a follow up
call (dlenrow,
14:58:32)
- Once projects are approved, we need to create a
project page on wiki and not make changes to proposal pages
(dlenrow,
15:00:18)
- That is end of published agenda. (dlenrow,
15:01:08)
- CP asks for other business? (dlenrow,
15:01:26)
- question on results of the lightning round last
week (dlenrow,
15:01:58)
- test and CI got lots of attention and will
become initial projects (dlenrow,
15:02:59)
- lots of notes and white boards captured and on
Wiki\ (dlenrow,
15:03:16)
- question: how do folks get visibility to
progress if not already involved in a project (dlenrow,
15:04:39)
- Projects will have their own weekly (or
similar) calls and IRC channels and info will be on project wiki.
Anyone can join any project meeting or read minutes/docs/wiki
(dlenrow,
15:06:20)
- http://new.livestream.com/accounts/5312056/events/3434564
(ChrisPriceAB,
15:07:05)
- http://new.livestream.com/accounts/5312056/events/3434564
(rpaik,
15:07:08)
- Ray asks if we also need summary type
minutes (dlenrow,
15:10:04)
- agree to have summary on wiki (dlenrow,
15:10:39)
- do we know what we plan to accomplish with
release 1? (dlenrow,
15:11:40)
- we don't know enough to define that yet
(dlenrow,
15:12:24)
Meeting ended at 15:13:15 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- Dlenrow to draft SR process wiki page ASAP
- Ian/Ulrich begin to draft this
Action items, by person
- dlenrow
- Dlenrow to draft SR process wiki page ASAP
People present (lines said)
- dlenrow (59)
- ChrisPriceAB (8)
- collabot (3)
- B_Smith_ (2)
- DirkKutscher (2)
- rpaik (2)
- nstpierre (1)
- AndChat|71489 (1)
- bin_ (1)
- Serge (1)
- TapioTallgren (1)
- Wenjing (1)
- chrispriceAB (0)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.