#opnfv-meeting: OPNFV TSC
Meeting started by ChrisPriceAB at 14:02:23 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- roll call (ChrisPriceAB, 14:02:34)
- Frank Brockners (frankbrockners,
14:02:37)
- Bryan Sullivan (bryan_att,
14:02:39)
- Chris Price (ChrisPriceAB,
14:02:40)
- Uli Kleber (ulik,
14:02:40)
- Ashiq Khan (Ashiq,
14:02:44)
- Dirk Kutscher (dku,
14:02:47)
- Heather Kirksey (HKirksey,
14:03:03)
- Pierre Lynch (plynch,
14:03:08)
- fuqiao (proxy for denghui) (fuqiao,
14:03:17)
- approval or previous minutes (ChrisPriceAB, 14:03:33)
- AGREED: minutes
approved (ChrisPriceAB,
14:03:39)
- Tapio Tallgren (tapio__,
14:03:50)
- Agenda Bashing (ChrisPriceAB, 14:04:01)
- dlenrow (dlenrow,
14:05:13)
- Chris Wright (cdub,
14:05:20)
- Wenjing (Wenjing,
14:05:29)
- Parviz (Parviz,
14:05:40)
- Louis Fourie (LouisF,
14:05:45)
- Update from the board f2f (ChrisPriceAB, 14:05:45)
- Thinh Nguyenphu (Thinh_,
14:06:15)
- discussion on whether OPNFV should issue
certificates; discussion moved to kind of trademark; need to come
back to this discussion in April (Gerald_K,
14:12:26)
- add certification discussion to the TSC call
close to Release 1 (rpaik,
14:13:05)
- Hack-fest planning and updates (ChrisPriceAB, 14:15:48)
- discussion to collocate with OpenStack summit.
openstack would prefer not to have two hackfest at the same
time. (Gerald_K,
14:17:04)
- ongoing dicussion on how to best engage with
openstack community? (Gerald_K,
14:18:06)
- talk to Telco WG and OpenStack event
team (Gerald_K,
14:19:02)
- working with OpenStack community to organize
our participation at the Vancouver OpenStack summit (rpaik,
14:19:37)
- IMO we need OPNFV-centric events (bryan_att,
14:21:07)
- hackfest planned for OPNFV summit in Q4 2015.
question whether additional hackfest middle of this year would be
needed? (Gerald_K,
14:21:14)
- I agree that we want to integrate with the
upstream communities, not park an OPNFV meeting in the middle of
their events - so we need some events that are OPNFV-centric
(bryan_att,
14:22:16)
- idea of "virtual hackfests" to avoid
travelling (Gerald_K,
14:22:19)
- I also support virtual hackfests, but I think
they are less successful as a community outreach method - but OK for
existing projects to focus on quick progress (bryan_att,
14:24:17)
- AGREED: The TSC
agrees to follow the existing schedule for summits and determine the
need for an additional event later in the year. (ChrisPriceAB,
14:25:17)
- Follow up- Development tool training, Jira, Gerrit, Git, Jenkins (ChrisPriceAB, 14:25:50)
- looking for volunteers to organize those
sessions (Gerald_K,
14:26:34)
- bryan asks if we have a quick guide to how we
intend to use the tools (ChrisPriceAB,
14:27:24)
- No. Currently each project is using the tools
in different ways. (Gerald_K,
14:28:12)
- Chris suggests that we might mandate project
leads to get trained on the tools (bryan_att,
14:29:03)
- Eric has written a Wiki page on this
(Gerald_K,
14:29:54)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/developer
(ChrisPriceAB,
14:30:07)
- contains information on how to work with the
tools (ChrisPriceAB,
14:30:27)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/developer
(frankbrockners,
14:30:56)
- ACTION: Ray to look
into LinuxFoundation training on the OPNFV toolchain (ChrisPriceAB,
14:31:30)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/developer/contribution_guidelines
- also has a reference to git commit styles. (frankbrockners,
14:32:24)
- Uli mention it may only be a problem of WHERE
to find this information. (Gerald_K,
14:32:50)
- I don't see any specific conventions listed on
that page - e.g. something even as simple as the git commit message
- but there are also likely things that will come up as conventions
in practice - we need to collect and publish them (bryan_att,
14:33:02)
- Fatih Degirmenci (fdegir,
14:33:08)
- Fatih offers to work on a training session
regarding Jenkins and Jira (ChrisPriceAB,
14:34:05)
- Iben to help Fatih on OPNFV related information
to clarify project needs. (ChrisPriceAB,
14:35:29)
- ACTION: Fatih, Iben
and Aric will look to build training material for OPNFV (ChrisPriceAB,
14:37:09)
- +1 to putting the docs in git so that we can
update them using the tools themselves (bryan_att,
14:37:27)
- Pranav (Pranav,
14:39:47)
- Key facts are served via iframe
https://wiki.opnfv.org/get_started (aricg,
14:43:17)
- Update on OPNFV hardware @LF data center (ChrisPriceAB, 14:45:25)
- this is the new plugin for serving the keys
facts: https://www.dokuwiki.org/plugin:scrape (aricg,
14:45:46)
- ray outlines that the hardware order has been
delivered to the LF Data Center (ChrisPriceAB,
14:45:49)
- currently doing inventory of items prior to
installation. (ChrisPriceAB,
14:46:05)
- Konstantin will provide a detailed update at
the next TSC call. (ChrisPriceAB,
14:46:40)
- Update on the Release 1 naming (ChrisPriceAB, 14:48:09)
- Ray describes that we should reduce the list of
names from the list to reduce the scanning isues and time for
infringements. (ChrisPriceAB,
14:49:04)
- list was sent to legal counsel for review.
recommendation to reduce number of names first to top 5, then they
will execute the legal check (Gerald_K,
14:49:11)
- Ray will start a vote on the mailing list for
the top choices (ChrisPriceAB,
14:49:57)
- the vote should be out today, it will close by
Monday next week. (ChrisPriceAB,
14:50:35)
- this will reduce the list of the top 5 for a
name search (ChrisPriceAB,
14:51:19)
- Discussion on awards programs for the OPNFV technical community (ChrisPriceAB, 14:54:10)
- awards program can be run once a year to top
contributors (e.g. at the end of a release) (Gerald_K,
14:54:57)
- cdub indicates seperating into categories may
be a good idea in OPNFV (ChrisPriceAB,
14:58:50)
- possible categories: documentation,
collaboration, testing, integration (rpaik,
15:00:01)
- ACTION: ray to begin
discussion on the lists about OPNFV recognition and awards. A
concrete proposal is required for budget approvals. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:03:45)
- Project plans & tracking - for release 1 (ChrisPriceAB, 15:04:26)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/get_started/get_started_installer_approach
(frankbrockners,
15:04:51)
- frankbrockners provides an update on the BGS
project. Each team is working on the backlog of development for the
release 1 timeframe. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:05:33)
- the team is looking to establish commonality
and converging on those areas. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:05:52)
- the team has begun moving to Jira for backlog
management, not yet complete but the idea is to increase
transaprency and visibility into the project. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:06:26)
- ACTION: frankbrockners and konstantin to establish
communication channels regarding the hardware configuration for the
linuxfoundation data-center. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:08:28)
- the plan is not to have manual instalation
occuring on the linuxfoundation hardware. This should be deployed
using the existing toolchain. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:09:48)
- https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/BGS-7?jql=project%20%3D%20BGS
- Jira for BGS (frankbrockners,
15:10:08)
- octopus overview (ChrisPriceAB,
15:10:13)
- Uli indicates the project has begun working in
Jira and that the working mode is now Jira based. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:10:36)
- octopus is awaiting build scripts to be made
available from the projects (ChrisPriceAB,
15:11:03)
- the scripts are currently described on an
etherpad outlining how they should be structured (ChrisPriceAB,
15:12:14)
- fdegir indicates there are some syntactical
scripts being enabled on the CI pipeline (ChrisPriceAB,
15:12:58)
- Link to BGS build/deploy script
blueprint/proposal https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/BGS_CI (fdegir,
15:13:35)
- functiontest update (ChrisPriceAB,
15:13:36)
- palani and morgan have ben working with Tempest
and Rally against a manually installed BGS environment (ChrisPriceAB,
15:14:10)
- the team is working with the tools currently
and how to integrate that with CI (ChrisPriceAB,
15:14:44)
- fdegir explains that the toolchains required to
be installed on the hardware should be made known to the
linuxfoundation team as backlog items (ChrisPriceAB,
15:16:36)
- documentation for release 1 (ChrisPriceAB,
15:17:10)
- Trevor describes that clear demarcation between
documentation activities will be important to set the scope for
release 1 (ChrisPriceAB,
15:17:44)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/documentation_projects/opnfv_documentation
(ChrisPriceAB,
15:18:12)
- Iben explains that not all documentation should
be captured in the documentation project but should be drawn out of
project specific documentation areas (ChrisPriceAB,
15:20:05)
- TSC discussed to hire a technical writer to
bootstrap the documentation (Gerald_K,
15:24:18)
- suggest to run a poll and give people time to
consider the need for a writer (bryan_att,
15:25:10)
- Creation review for the Resource Scheduler project (ChrisPriceAB, 15:27:52)
- Presenter is Zhiqi Wang (rpaik,
15:28:36)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/requirements_projects/resource_scheduler
(Gerald_K,
15:29:24)
- quick comment is that Congress gets data from
various sources not just Nova - and Copper focuses on policy engine
features through and beyond Congress (bryan_att,
15:35:56)
- recommendation for close coordination with
OPNFV project teaams like Copper & Promise (rpaik,
15:39:01)
- Discussion on if there is a need to add more
details in the Planned Deliverables section (rpaik,
15:47:36)
- VOTE: Voted on "Do you
approve create of the Resource Scheduler Projects?" Results are, +1:
9 (rpaik,
15:52:28)
- openstack community update (ChrisPriceAB, 15:53:16)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/community/openstack
(ChrisPriceAB,
15:53:58)
- FYI I added draft blueprint info for Copper to
the page (bryan_att,
15:54:12)
- dneary outlines some of the challenges in
engaging in openstack and our responsibilities when engaging with
the commuinty (ChrisPriceAB,
15:54:26)
- the openstack community page on the OPNFV wiki
is intended to be a common information repository for our openstack
actiities (ChrisPriceAB,
15:54:55)
- dneary outlines the blueprint process for
openstack, including the level if detail required including
implemementation details and high level use cases associated with
the feature (ChrisPriceAB,
15:55:36)
- dneary invites all project with active
blueprints to list them on the wiki page so the community can
collaborate on them (ChrisPriceAB,
15:56:31)
- the target is to be ready by May with OPNFV
blueprints with the right level of detail and structure (ChrisPriceAB,
15:56:58)
- The first idea is to develop a
comprehensive/reusable event-driven policy engine support across
Openstack core components - the first step is to investigate current
Openstack support for such event-driven operation. The second idea
is to extend the data sources supported by Congress for specific
OPNFV use cases. (bryan_att,
15:57:18)
- meetings may be planned for "blueprint best
practices" in order to have consistency. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:59:19)
Meeting ended at 16:00:23 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- Ray to look into LinuxFoundation training on the OPNFV toolchain
- Fatih, Iben and Aric will look to build training material for OPNFV
- ray to begin discussion on the lists about OPNFV recognition and awards. A concrete proposal is required for budget approvals.
- frankbrockners and konstantin to establish communication channels regarding the hardware configuration for the linuxfoundation data-center.
Action items, by person
- frankbrockners
- frankbrockners and konstantin to establish communication channels regarding the hardware configuration for the linuxfoundation data-center.
- UNASSIGNED
- Ray to look into LinuxFoundation training on the OPNFV toolchain
- Fatih, Iben and Aric will look to build training material for OPNFV
- ray to begin discussion on the lists about OPNFV recognition and awards. A concrete proposal is required for budget approvals.
People present (lines said)
- ChrisPriceAB (68)
- Gerald_K (19)
- collabot (13)
- bryan_att (13)
- rpaik (10)
- dlenrow (9)
- aricg (9)
- frankbrockners (7)
- ulik (3)
- tapio__ (3)
- Pranav (2)
- fdegir (2)
- fuqiao (2)
- LouisF (2)
- cdub (2)
- dneary (1)
- plynch (1)
- Thinh_ (1)
- cgoncalves (1)
- Parviz (1)
- TNadeau (1)
- zhipeng_ (1)
- B_Smith_ (1)
- HKirksey (1)
- Wenjing (1)
- dku (1)
- Ashiq (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.