#opnfv-meeting: OPNFV TSC
Meeting started by ChrisPriceAB at 15:00:04 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- roll call (ChrisPriceAB, 15:00:11)
- Chris Price (ChrisPriceAB,
15:00:25)
- Gerald Kunzmann (GeraldK,
15:01:07)
- Carlos Goncalves (cgoncalves,
15:01:15)
- Uli Kleber (uli-k_,
15:01:18)
- Tapio Tallgren (TapioT,
15:01:25)
- Edgar StPierre (edgarstp,
15:01:30)
- approval of previous minutes of meeting (ChrisPriceAB, 15:03:07)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/tsc#february_23_2016
the minutes of the previous meeting (ChrisPriceAB,
15:03:19)
- no comments received on the minutes
approved. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:03:30)
- Agenda Bashing (ChrisPriceAB, 15:03:38)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/tsc#march_1_2016
todays agenda (ChrisPriceAB,
15:03:58)
- Morgan Richomme (morgan_orange,
15:04:14)
- uli-k outlines that we should discuss how to
handle the release additions (ChrisPriceAB,
15:05:41)
- Brahmaputra release recap/update (ChrisPriceAB, 15:06:35)
- Dave Neary (dneary,
15:06:57)
- Debra outlines that the teams are focused on
troubleshooting scenario's that were not in a completely "release
ready" state for Brahmaputra (ChrisPriceAB,
15:07:19)
- Trevor Cooper for Brian Skerry (trevor_intel1,
15:07:22)
- we are starting to understand that some of the
limitations may not be solved in the B release timeframe and may be
documented limitations. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:07:44)
- Brahmaputra stable handling discussion: on post
brahmaputra stable handling (ChrisPriceAB,
15:08:41)
- morgan_orange outlines the need to establish a
methodology for handling C release activities in parallel with
B-stable handling. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:09:20)
- the current assumption is that we will work
only on Master and stable/brahaputra and tag the releases as they
are ready on stable/brahmaputra. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:10:19)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/releases/stablebranch
current stable branch handling (ChrisPriceAB,
15:10:54)
- Julien (Julien-zte,
15:12:16)
- uli-k_ outlines that we would not do "stable
release" but only stabilize scenario's. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:12:24)
- Bin Hu (for Bryan Sullivan) (bin_,
15:19:25)
- discussion if all bug fixes still require same
level of testing (e.g. 4 successful runs) (rpaik,
15:21:10)
- morgan_orange outlines that changes to stable
are unlikely to not be completely isolated. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:22:10)
- morgan also adds that our CI is there to ensure
we can validate changes across the release (ChrisPriceAB,
15:22:53)
- can we limit the scenarios(or won't add more)
to enter into Brahmaputra, so we can fix the limited bugs and focus
on C. (Julien-zte,
15:23:18)
- miss the deadline won't be released in current
version (Julien-zte,
15:23:59)
- the intention is not absolutely not add new
scenario's or features to Brahmaputra. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:24:47)
- the focus as of now is to stabilize the not yet
release ready scenario's (ChrisPriceAB,
15:25:15)
- we should ensure we secure resources for stable
handling of stable/brahmaputra once the scenario's are in a stable
state and other resources are assigned to C release. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:27:06)
- ACTION: octopus,
releng to work with the design teams to establish a resource plan
for stable handling port Brahmaputra 2.0 (ChrisPriceAB,
15:30:37)
- ACTION: octopus,
releng to document stable branch handling and labeling for
stable/brahmaputra on the release wiki (ChrisPriceAB,
15:31:17)
- http://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-project-leads/2016-March/000363.html
(fdegir,
15:31:58)
- The communications team information on the web
launch of Brahmaputra (ChrisPriceAB,
15:33:30)
- https://www.opnfv.org/brahmaputra
Brahmaputra landing page (rpaik,
15:34:06)
- https://www.opnfv.org/news-faq/press-release/2016/02/opnfv-delivers-second-release-open-source-network-functions
Brahmaputra press release (rpaik,
15:34:22)
- https://www.opnfv.org/software/download
Brahmaputra downloads page (rpaik,
15:34:40)
- https://www.opnfv.org/news-faq/blog/2016/03/navigating-brahmaputra
Chris Price's blog post (rpaik,
15:34:47)
- https://www.opnfv.org/software/download
Brahmaputra downloads page (rpaik,
15:35:16)
- https://www.opnfv.org/news-faq/blog/2016/03/navigating-brahmaputra
Chris Price's blog post (rpaik,
15:35:29)
- http://ctt.ec/ap8T4 for re-tweet
(rpaik,
15:35:40)
- http://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2016-March/008535.html
email from Heather (rpaik,
15:35:53)
- Release C Planning (ChrisPriceAB, 15:36:39)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/releases/releaseplanning
immediate topics to address for C release (ChrisPriceAB,
15:36:59)
- the dates in the wiki are one month delayed
from our target (ChrisPriceAB,
15:40:01)
- uli-k_ outlines our milestones need to identify
and support the inter project dependencies. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:40:34)
- it may be worth staging the milestones for
specific components of the release. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:41:28)
- ildikov outlines the need to focus on the
integration and testing of the platform capabilities (ChrisPriceAB,
15:42:57)
- edgar states that ew need to be very clear on
the fixed dates that projects need to be able to achieve.
(ChrisPriceAB,
15:47:03)
- ACTION: ChrisPriceAB
to start a discussion on the mailing list to iterate on the wiki
page (rpaik,
15:48:37)
- AGREED: the TSC
agrees that we try to establish our milestone plan for the C release
with the intention of opening the C-Release next Tuesday for project
participation. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:49:53)
- C release naming update (ChrisPriceAB, 15:50:49)
- rpaik is collecting name nominations at this
time. This opportunity will close tomorrow. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:51:26)
- rpaik will open a poll on march 3rd that will
remain open for a week. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:51:43)
- ildikov asks if we have guidelines on the names
for the releases (simple names etc) (ChrisPriceAB,
15:52:29)
- there is no wish to impose restrictions on the
naming of our releases. (ChrisPriceAB,
15:55:18)
- AoB (ChrisPriceAB, 15:55:26)
- Statement from LSO: (1) Brahmaputra release is
focused on the data center and not on providing services to the
network or customer CPEs. The LSOAPI project is specifically about
providing business services to service provider customers on the
network, so project objectives do not align with Brahmaputra.
(uli-k_,
15:56:47)
- We should try to avoid such perception for the
C-Release (uli-k_,
15:59:52)
Meeting ended at 16:00:48 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- octopus, releng to work with the design teams to establish a resource plan for stable handling port Brahmaputra 2.0
- octopus, releng to document stable branch handling and labeling for stable/brahmaputra on the release wiki
- ChrisPriceAB to start a discussion on the mailing list to iterate on the wiki page
Action items, by person
- ChrisPriceAB
- ChrisPriceAB to start a discussion on the mailing list to iterate on the wiki page
- UNASSIGNED
- octopus, releng to work with the design teams to establish a resource plan for stable handling port Brahmaputra 2.0
- octopus, releng to document stable branch handling and labeling for stable/brahmaputra on the release wiki
People present (lines said)
- ChrisPriceAB (41)
- rpaik (14)
- dneary (4)
- collabot` (4)
- Julien-zte (3)
- fdegir (3)
- uli-k_ (3)
- cgoncalves (2)
- ildikov (2)
- GeraldK (1)
- TapioT (1)
- jose_lausuch (1)
- morgan_orange (1)
- bin_ (1)
- edgarstp (1)
- trevor_intel1 (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.