#opnfv-meeting: TSC weekly meeting
Meeting started by tallgren at 15:01:10 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- Uli Kleber (uli-k,
15:01:17)
- Bryan Sullivan (bryan_att,
15:01:19)
- Morgan Richomme (morgan_orange,
15:01:23)
- Tapio Tallgren (tallgren,
15:01:35)
- David McBride (dmcbride,
15:01:37)
- Jack Morgan (jmorgan1,
15:01:52)
- Stuart Mackie (StuartMackie,
15:01:58)
- Edgar StPierre (edgarstp,
15:02:03)
- Frank Brockners (frankbrockners,
15:02:11)
- Lincoln Lavoie (lylavoie,
15:02:21)
- Bin Hu (bin_,
15:02:27)
- Tim Irnich (timirnich,
15:03:36)
- agenda
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC (morgan_orange,
15:04:46)
- Tim Rozet(proxy for Dave Neary) (trozet,
15:04:48)
- approval of previous minutes (rpaik, 15:05:00)
- Tapio asks about the state of the discussion on
the proposed rescuer project. Bin answers that there are actions to
close before a creation review (uli-k,
15:05:04)
- no feedback on the minutes thus approved
(rpaik,
15:05:17)
- agenda bashing (rpaik, 15:05:24)
- rprakash (rprakash,
15:05:27)
- Jonas Bjurel (Stand in for Fatih) (JonasB,
15:05:35)
- no other topics proposed (rpaik,
15:06:07)
- Plugfest/Hackfest (rpaik, 15:06:17)
- Julien (Julien-zte,
15:06:32)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Plugfest+-+Colorado+Release
wiki page for the event (rpaik,
15:06:46)
- Trevor Cooper (trevor_intel,
15:07:07)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Co-located+Plugfest-Hackfest+Planning+Page
schedule/planning page (rpaik,
15:07:16)
- 15 companies registered to Plugfest, 45
people (tallgren,
15:07:21)
- 5 companies are providing equipments
(rpaik,
15:07:36)
- https://www.regonline.com/OPNFVPlugfestDec2016
registration page (rpaik,
15:07:49)
- community members are encourage to add topics
for the schedule page above (rpaik,
15:08:46)
- participants should collaborate with each other
on plugfest work planning (rpaik,
15:09:10)
- ROE is part of the registration process
(rpaik,
15:11:25)
- there are three rooms available for
meeting/breakouts (rpaik,
15:12:53)
- discussion on what can be shared publicly after
the Plugfest/Hackfest within 60 days (rpaik,
15:18:22)
- ROE protects results of the plugfest from
disclosure, but results from Hackfest are needed for Danube
release (uli-k,
15:18:22)
- Graduation reviews discussion (tallgren, 15:20:13)
- rpaik has started the email discussion, it is
ongoing (uli-k,
15:21:32)
- ACTION: rpaik to
setup a discussion during plugfest/hackfest (rpaik,
15:21:55)
- https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/barcelona-infra-f2f
(jmorgan1,
15:22:49)
- configuration file and scenario naming (rpaik, 15:22:52)
- https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/23725/
(morgan_orange,
15:23:19)
- jmorgan1 summarized the discussion that started
in Barcelona and noted that the current scenario naming convention
could be improved (rpaik,
15:23:49)
- https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/23727/
(morgan_orange,
15:24:31)
- jmorgan1 adds that no objections for major
feedback received so far from the community (rpaik,
15:25:35)
- TSC approval needed to get a commitment -
change will trigger extra work especially on installer projects. But
without this evolution CI evolution would not be possible
(morgan_orange,
15:26:43)
- questions from JonasB and frankbrockners asks
if this will be scalable going forward esp. with CI evolution
(rpaik,
15:29:19)
- frankbrockners reminded that a similar proposal
was made for Brahmaputra and later, without success (morgan_orange,
15:30:31)
- a way to ensure the success of CI evolution:
maybe indicate that it is a condition to be part of Danube
(morgan_orange,
15:33:15)
- frankbrockners asks if we are forcing people to
adopt this proposal for Danube (rpaik,
15:33:45)
- on the previous topic (Plugfest vs Hackfest), I
created a new child page "Colorado Hackfest Test Cases", moved the
VNF Portability Scope description there, and linked it to the
"Co-located Plugfest-Hackfest Planning Page" page. I'll explain the
rationale for the change on the list as discussed on the
call. (bryan_att,
15:37:32)
- jonas brings up concern to cover all
architectures in these proposals (jmorgan1,
15:39:26)
- Goals & vision for the Danube release (tallgren, 15:40:07)
- ACTION: jmorgan1 to
collect feedback over then bring proposal back in two weeks for
vote (jmorgan1,
15:40:36)
- uli-k encourages fbrockners and JonasB to
call-in to the INFRA meeting and work on the missing parts.
(uli-k,
15:41:22)
- morgan_orange presents the slides at
https://wiki.opnfv.org/download/attachments/2925933/Building%20a%20TSC%20vision%20for%20Danube.pptx?version=1&modificationDate=1478612403468&api=v2
(uli-k,
15:50:27)
- there could be a bottom up approach from WG's,
feature projects, etc. (rpaik,
15:57:54)
- IMO we are certainly building reference
platforms(s) (bryan_att,
15:58:23)
- concern raised on if we are giving up on
reference platform (rpaik,
15:58:37)
- I do not understand the assertion that we are
not (bryan_att,
15:58:39)
- suggestion to continue the discussion via
mailing list (rpaik,
15:59:51)
Meeting ended at 16:00:37 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- rpaik to setup a discussion during plugfest/hackfest
- jmorgan1 to collect feedback over then bring proposal back in two weeks for vote
Action items, by person
- jmorgan1
- jmorgan1 to collect feedback over then bring proposal back in two weeks for vote
- rpaik
- rpaik to setup a discussion during plugfest/hackfest
People present (lines said)
- rpaik (28)
- trozet (13)
- jmorgan1 (13)
- uli-k (11)
- morgan_orange (8)
- collabot` (8)
- tallgren (7)
- bryan_att (5)
- ChrisPriceAB (4)
- Julien-zte (3)
- dmcbride (2)
- frankbrockners (1)
- trevor_intel (1)
- timirnich (1)
- rprakash (1)
- bin_ (1)
- edgarstp (1)
- lylavoie (1)
- JonasB (1)
- StuartMackie (1)
- ulik (0)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.