#opnfv-meeting: Weekly Technical Discuss Meeting #174

Meeting started by jentoio at 12:58:36 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. Roll Call (jentoio, 12:58:44)
    1. Jack Morgan (jentoio, 12:58:48)
    2. Fu Qiao (jentoio, 12:59:34)
    3. Al Morton (jentoio, 13:00:53)
    4. Sridhar rao (jentoio, 13:03:21)
    5. Anusha (jentoio, 13:04:16)
    6. Jim Baker (jentoio, 13:05:42)

  2. Common Infrastructure Realization & Validation (CIRV) project (jentoio, 13:06:27)
    1. Sridhar shared an update from last weeks meeting with CNTT (jentoio, 13:06:53)
    2. Al Morton (acmacm, 13:07:32)
    3. shared about cookbook status and that each OPNFV project should take ownership ofdocumentation (jentoio, 13:08:42)
    4. Chandrasekaran (jentoio, 13:09:40)
    5. Parth Yadav (jentoio, 13:09:58)
    6. CNTT just to keep the requirements in their documentation and have OPNFV projects drive documentation within OPNFV (jentoio, 13:12:13)
    7. CNTT RI/RC meeting will create proposal on a way forward (jentoio, 13:15:04)
    8. "some chapters are just copied from OPNFV" ? (acmacm, 13:15:13)
    9. Georg Kunz (georgk, 13:15:57)
    10. Jim shares that CNTT that are working on figuring out how to move forward from CNTT documentation / requirements to implementation within OPNFV project (jentoio, 13:20:21)
    11. some of the details on how to go about doing that is still being worked out as Jack asks about how this might be done (jentoio, 13:21:49)
    12. Al /Fu Qiao discuss a specific example PDF_2.0/HDV as a requirement to implementation (jentoio, 13:29:09)
    13. CIRV project mandate appears to have gaps between current plan and how or what changes need to be made (jentoio, 13:31:40)
    14. Al mentions that current committer/contributer list seems to have lots of people but not a lot of work is getting done (jentoio, 13:33:34)
    15. Sridhar mentions perhaps CIRV can have a regular meeting to address these concerns (jentoio, 13:35:14)
    16. Fu Qiao asks why we are having this discussion on CIRV, Jack mentions that their is a gap between the project mandate and actual current plan (jentoio, 13:40:09)
    17. Fu Qiao suggest that we need to figure out how to migrate CNTT RI/RC to OPNFV first, then CIRV can re-evaluate its manadate (jentoio, 13:42:02)

  3. Virtual Developer & Testing Form (jentoio, 13:47:56)
    1. event is June 22-25, project proposals are due June 3rd and today we are wanting to discuss what joint topics we want to have (jentoio, 13:49:58)
    2. What topics do we want to have a joint presentation with CNTT/OPNFV? (jentoio, 13:50:47)
    3. from of the OPNFV 2.0 meeting a few topics came up... (jentoio, 13:53:44)
    4. CIRV RI/RC Scope and Interaction (jentoio, 13:53:49)
    5. OPNFV / CNTT Release Processes _&_ Cadence (jentoio, 13:54:02)
    6. Industry adoption - Badging (jentoio, 13:56:03)
    7. Thanks Jack! (acmacm, 14:04:28)

Meeting ended at 14:04:39 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. (none)

People present (lines said)

  1. jentoio (33)
  2. collab-meetbot (3)
  3. acmacm (3)
  4. georgk (1)

Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.