#opnfv-release: OPNFV Release Process Working Group
Meeting started by dmcbride_ at 13:01:54 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- roll call (dmcbride_, 13:02:03)
- Trevor Bramwell (bramwelt,
13:02:09)
- David McBride (dmcbride_,
13:02:33)
- Emma Foley (efoley,
13:03:09)
- Rama (dmcbride_,
13:05:53)
- We will still have a twice yearly release, to
help with project promotion and marketing (efoley,
13:12:50)
- The CD release model will server as meta
releases throughout the cycle (efoley,
13:13:16)
- Mark Beierl (mbeierl,
13:13:16)
- Release process should be lightweight for
"official" and "intermediate" releases, as the current process is
considered burdensome for some (efoley,
13:14:00)
- https://jenkins.io/download/lts/
(bramwelt,
13:18:36)
- every 6 months take the "best" release and make
that part of an OPNFV release (dmcbride_,
13:18:38)
- bramwelt describes Jenkins release cycle -
every 2 weeks plus major release every 12 weeks (dmcbride_,
13:19:29)
- Trevor suggested that there should be two
separate independant for CD and traditional release. Every 6 months,
pick a previous CD release and "upgrade" it to LTS (efoley,
13:21:29)
- for the traditional release, choose a CD
release, and promote that as the "big" release; Some additional
testing/validation/collatoral may be needed to package this big
release. (efoley,
13:25:03)
- How does a CD release get chose as the
"big"/official release? We need to define criteria for choosing an
official release from the set of CD releases (efoley,
13:26:16)
- bramwelt suggests two levels of process: 1)
individual project releases; and 2) OPNFV major releases
(dmcbride_,
13:44:09)
- bramwelt says define requirements first, then
determine process (dmcbride_,
13:48:18)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Continuous+Delivery+Release+Planning
(efoley,
13:50:46)
- ACTION: dmcbride to
locate CD process documentation from the last plugfest (dmcbride_,
13:52:33)
- Release requirements need to be defined per
type of project (efoley,
13:53:05)
- test projects need to be validated separately,
so that the validation they provide is credible (efoley,
13:55:18)
- do we need release artifacts? (dmcbride_, 13:56:32)
Meeting ended at 14:05:39 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- dmcbride to locate CD process documentation from the last plugfest
People present (lines said)
- efoley (11)
- dmcbride_ (11)
- collabot` (3)
- mbeierl (2)
- bramwelt (2)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.