#opnfv-vswitchperf: OPNFV VSPERF
Meeting started by trevor_intel at 15:01:45 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- Al Morton (acm,
15:02:34)
- Trevor Cooper (trevor_intel,
15:04:20)
- TREX patch for promiscuous mode (trevor_intel, 15:04:55)
- Do we want to enable this by default?
(acm,
15:06:09)
- We need to investigate what other traffic
generators do (trevor_intel,
15:12:14)
- ...before making promiscuous mode a default for
all generators (acm,
15:13:57)
- Decision is for now to merge Christian patch
that does NOT allow TREX to be promiscuous by default (trevor_intel,
15:14:06)
- Martin will enter a ticket re. investigation of
other TGs and future behavior for consistency (trevor_intel,
15:14:45)
- Euphrates milestones (trevor_intel, 15:16:08)
- CI still does not work in Intel POD
(trevor_intel,
15:20:44)
- Its not feasible for VSPERF to relocate CI POD
for the release (trevor_intel,
15:22:49)
- Decision is to that current OVS and DPDK
versions are tested sufficiently to pass MS8 (trevor_intel,
15:25:12)
- Decision is to cherry pick TREX patch to stable
(Martin K will do it) (trevor_intel,
15:26:37)
- Documentation updated for MS9 ... Christian
will review Euphrates doc patches (by Oct 4th) (trevor_intel,
15:29:35)
- Jira cleanup (trevor_intel, 15:31:11)
- Trevor to check all open issues and fix
versions (trevor_intel,
15:31:33)
- ACTION: everyone
check JIRA tickets and update status -- there should be No Open
Issues Tagged Euphrates (acm,
15:32:51)
- PTL role beyond Euphrates (trevor_intel, 15:33:25)
- Trevor will step down (trevor_intel,
15:34:50)
- Fuel support for VSPERF in the release (trevor_intel, 15:41:04)
- FYI - the term "promiscuous" does not appear in
RFC 2544... (acm,
15:42:07)
- Decision is that with changes to Fuel installer
we will not package VSPERF with Fuel for Euphrates release. VSPERF
is a stand-alone tool that is not dependent on Open Stack.
(trevor_intel,
15:51:35)
- VSPREF is independent from the Installers and
Open Stack - this is in Trevor's change of the description
patch (acm,
15:51:41)
- Sridhar's Questions: 1. Is VSPERF part of any
OPNFV installer scenarios? 2. Can VSPERF be installed on existing
Openstack Installation? (acm,
15:52:42)
- this is a 2 question FAQ (acm,
15:53:31)
- Trevor propose a patch to address the
questions (trevor_intel,
15:54:41)
- POD12 resource use (trevor_intel, 15:56:08)
- Martin suggests to create another Sandbox,
there has been some resource conflicts during development
(acm,
15:57:15)
- Martin proposes to repurpose node-1 and node-2
for sandbox environments (trevor_intel,
15:57:19)
- Trevor to check if there are spare ports on
Ixia (trevor_intel,
15:57:58)
- if there are some spare ports on IXIA, could
connect to Node 1 (acm,
15:58:15)
Meeting ended at 15:59:40 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- everyone check JIRA tickets and update status -- there should be No Open Issues Tagged Euphrates
People present (lines said)
- trevor_intel (23)
- acm (10)
- collabot` (3)
- OPNFV-Gerrit-Bot (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.