#opnfv-vswitchperf: vswitchperf
Meeting started by SridharRao at 14:59:43 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Development Update. (SridharRao, 15:06:32)
- CI issue still exists - Trevor has mentioned
that he'll get it fixed by end of this week. (SridharRao,
15:08:35)
- Sridhar imix-patch is ready, but frame-size
configuration should be decided when we use imix. (SridharRao,
15:09:28)
- Review are still pending. (SridharRao,
15:12:11)
- 5 Reviews for patches from Martin and Richard
required. (SridharRao,
15:12:50)
- VSPERF-CloudNative (SridharRao, 15:14:04)
- Is it (Container Networking benchmarking)
Required? (SridharRao,
16:00:24)
- Should VSPERF include Container Networking
benchmarking? Yes and should first decide exactly what it will be
doing considering other efforts in OPNFV. (SridharRao,
16:01:16)
- Only Virtual Switches Based Solutions? OVS and
VPP? Answer is NO. We should be open to newer solutions. In
somecases the workload may define the solution. (SridharRao,
16:01:57)
- Main Distribution or Sub-Project? THe main
point is How to align CN benchmarking with VSPERF's story!. We
should define the goal and scope of the work. (SridharRao,
16:02:46)
- Single-Host or Multi-Host? We can start with
single host and expand going ahead. (SridharRao,
16:03:16)
- We need not restrict to "Baremetal" only and
consider various deployment options. (SridharRao,
16:03:38)
- VSPERF can stick to CNI only - and CNM may be
considered, if required. (SridharRao,
16:04:15)
- TGEn in a container would add newer test
scenarios (SridharRao,
16:04:44)
- ACTION: Sridhar to
create "proposal" patch covering the goals and scope. (SridharRao,
16:05:12)
- ACTION: Sridhar to
share the summary of the existing performance studies - Topology,
Performance-figures, COnclusion and analysis of its applicability to
VSPERF (SridharRao,
16:05:49)
Meeting ended at 16:05:53 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- Sridhar to create "proposal" patch covering the goals and scope.
- Sridhar to share the summary of the existing performance studies - Topology, Performance-figures, COnclusion and analysis of its applicability to VSPERF
People present (lines said)
- SridharRao (19)
- collabot` (3)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.